Login
Register
Your login | |
Your password | |
Confirm your password | |
Your email | |
I agree to receive the R3i newsletter | |
STUDY SUMMARY | ||
Methods |
|
|
Main results |
|
COMMENT
Whereas the role of fasting TGs on ischemic stroke risk has been a matter of debate, a potential role of nonfasting TGs was suggested in 2 studies reporting strong associations between nonfastingTGs and coronary1 or global cardiovascular risk.2 Data from the Copenhagen City Heart Study provide evidence that the association between nonfasting TGs and macrovascular risk particularly applies to ischemic stroke risk. For measurement of both nonfasting TGs and remnants lipoproteins cholesterol, blood samples were drawn between 8 AM and 4 PM, and 82% of participants had eaten a meal within the last 3 hours of blood sampling. The prospective study detected a significant association between linear increases in levels of nonfasting triglycerides and increases in risk of ischemic stroke. This was corroborated by the cross-sectional study showing significantly higher levels of nonfasting TGs in patients having experienced a first stroke event.
Nonfasting triglycerides: a valuable target to reduce residual risk of ischemic stroke
These results draw attention to nonfasting TGs not only as a useful parameter to help better predict cardiovascular risk, but also as a therapeutic target to reduce residual risk of ischemic stroke persisting even after intensive LDL-C-lowering therapy. The efficacy and limits of intensive LDL-C-lowering therapy have been well documented in the SPARCL study,3 a secondary prevention trial of atorvastatin 80 mg per day vs. placebo, in which a mean LDL-C level of 73 mg/dL (1.9 mmol/l) was achieved. This study reported a significant 22% reduction in relative risk of ischemic stroke. A secondary analysis suggested that patients who benefited most of treatment with atorvastatin were those who had the greatest reduction in LDL-C.4 However, in an explanatory analysis of the same study,5 low HDL-C was the only lipid factor associated with an outcome stroke. Elevated TGs were not, but only fasting TGs were measured. The SPARCL investigators concluded that raising HDL-C levels in addition to lowering LDL-C might be an effective means of reducing residual stroke risk. On the other hand, the Copenhagen City Heart Study suggests that both LDL-C and TGs – more precisely, nonfasting TGs – should be targeted. Both studies provide evidence suggesting that treating atherogenic dyslipidemia is one of the key measures to reduce the residual risk of ischemic stroke.
Nonfasting triglycerides measurement needs standardization before being used in clinical practice
The clinical value of nonfasting triglycerides to assess cardiovascular risk has been challenged due to the variability of triglycerides levels following fatty meals intake. However, according to the authors, the variability observed during fat-tolerance tests does not reflect what happens during everyday food intake . Nevertheless, they acknowledge that time and content of the most recent meal should be standardized before using nonfasting TGs in clinical practice.
Figure 1. Prospective study: hazard ratios for ischemic stroke by increasing levels of nonfasting TGs
at baseline (up to 31 years of complete follow-up).
All hazard ratios were calculated vs. nonfasting triglyceride levels < 89 mg/dl (1.0 mmol/l).
Table 1. Cross-sectional study: nonfasting TG (mg/dL) |
|||
Patients with ischemic stroke |
Controls |
p |
|
Men | 191 (IQR, 131-259) | 148 (IQR, 104-214) | <0.01 |
Women | 167 (IQR, 121-229) | 127 (IQR, 91-181) | <0.05 |
Table 2. Cross-sectional study: remnant cholesterol (mg/dL) |
|||
Patients with ischemic stroke |
Controls |
p |
|
Men | 38 (IQR, 26-51) | 29 (IQR, 20-42) | <0.01 |
Women | 33 (IQR, 24-45) | 25 (IQR, 18-35) | <0.05 |
References |
|