Prof. Jean Charles Fruchart, Prof. Michel Hermans, Prof. Pierre Amarenco
Despite optimal risk factor control, residual cardiovascular risk remains a persistent challenge for clinicians managing patients with or at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Attention has therefore focused on targeting other drivers of this risk. Among lipid-related factors, triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoproteins, remnant cholesterol, and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] have been recognised as key determinants of residual risk
1-3. However, in the case of TG-rich lipoproteins and remnant cholesterol, major outcomes studies have had mixed results
4-6. Whether this lack of a definitive answer is attributable to the complexity of TG-rich lipoprotein metabolism, necessitating careful selection of therapeutic targets, the need to reduce total atherogenic cholesterol (both mass and particle number), patient selection criteria or other features of study design is contentious and the subject of ongoing debate
1 7-9. Furthermore, although Lp(a) is established as a casual risk factor for ASCVD
3, there is no evidence as yet that lowering elevated Lp(a) levels reduces cardiovascular events.
In view of these considerations, the search for novel therapeutics that act at these lipid targets continues. This year’s American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions provided some intriguing insights. First, there were new data for olezarsen, an siRNA apolipoprotein C-III (APOC3) therapeutic. APOC3 is a key regulator of lipoprotein metabolism and has a pivotal role in regulating TG levels
1. Studies of genetic variants that result in a loss of function and reduced plasma levels of APOC3 are associated with a reduced risk of coronary heart disease
10,12, providing a strong rationale for investigating the therapeutic potential of this approach. Preliminary studies with olezarsen were encouraging
13,14, providing a basis for further investigation. The Bridge–TIMI 73a trial was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of olezarsen in high-risk patients with moderate or severe hypertriglyceridemia, although in practice the majority of patients (128/154, 83%) had moderately elevated TG levels (150 to 499 mg/dL, overall median TG level 241.5 mg/dL)
15. Treatment with olezarsen reduced plasma TG levels by ~50% at 6 months, as well as other atherogenic targets including apoB (by 18%) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (up to 25%). With a favourable safety profile to date, the results suggest potential for this agent in addressing residual cardiovascular risk. Olezarsen also showed benefit in patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome with significant reduction in fasting TG at 6 months in the 80 mg dose group
16.
Additionally, there were encouraging data with zerlasiran, the latest siRNA targeting hepatic synthesis of apolipoprotein(a), a key determinant of Lp(a) levels. In patients with stable ASCVD and Lp(a) levels >150 nmol/L, administration of zerlasiran (either 200 mg every 4 weeks or 300 or 450 mg every 8 weeks) resulted in almost 100% inhibition of Lp(a) levels (97-98% reduction) after 2 doses
17. With favourable tolerability to date, further clinical development is indicated. Another novel siRNA targeting Lp(a) – lepodisiran – is also on the horizon, with a phase 1 study completed (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04914546) and an ongoing phase 2 trial due to complete later this year (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05565742). Despite these innovations, awareness of the need for Lp(a) testing among clinicians remains a major obstacle to better integration of Lp(a) management into clinical practice
18.
With evidence that ~40% of patients treated with statins continue to experience cardiovascular events over 10 years, residual cardiovascular risk continues to be a major clinical challenge in the 21st century. New strategies targeting other drivers of both lipid- and non-lipid related residual cardiovascular risk are clearly needed. Insights from ACC.2024 suggest new possibilities, although major outcomes studies are mandatory for proof of benefit.
References
1. Ginsberg HN, Packard CJ, Chapman MJ, et al. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and their remnants: metabolic insights, role in atherosclerotic cardiovascular dis ease, and emerging therapeutic strategies: a consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J 2021;42:4791-806.
2. Nordestgaard BG. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: new insights from epidemiology, genetics, and biology. Circ Res 2016;118:547-63.
3. Kronenberg F, Mora S, Stroes ESG, et al. Lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and aortic stenosis: a European Atherosclerosis Society consensus statement. Eur Heart J 2022;43:3925–46.
4. Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Miller M, et al. Cardiovascular risk reduction with icosapent ethyl for hypertriglyceridemia. N Engl J Med 2019;380:11-22.
5. Nicholls SJ, Lincoff AM, Garcia M, et al. Effect of high-dose omega-3 fatty acids vs corn oil on major adverse cardiovascular events in patients at high cardiovascular risk: the STRENGTH randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2020;324: 2268-80.
6. Das Pradhan A, Glynn RJ, Fruchart JC, et al. Triglyceride lowering with pemafibrate to reduce cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med 2022;387:1923-34.
7. Virani S. The Fibrates Story — A Tepid End to a PROMINENT Drug. N Engl J Med 2022;387:1991-2.
8. Doi T, Langsted A, Nordestgaard BG. Remnant cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apoB absolute mass changes explain results of the PROMINENT trial. Atherosclerosis doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2024.117556.
9. Doi T, Langsted A, Nordestgaard BG. A possible explanation for the contrasting results of REDUCE-IT vs. STRENGTH: cohort study mimicking trial designs. Eur Heart J 2021;42: 4807-17.
10. Jørgensen AB, Frikke-Schmidt R, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjærg-Hansen A. Loss of-function mutations in APOC3 and risk of ischemic vascular disease. N Engl J Med 2014;371:32-41.
11. Pollin TI, Damcott CM, Shen H, et al. A null mutation in human APOC3 confers a favorable plasma lipid profile and ap parent cardioprotection. Science 2008;322:1702-5.
12. Crosby J, Peloso GM, Auer PL, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in APOC3, triglycerides, and coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2014;371:22-31.
13. Alexander VJ, Xia S, Hurh E, et al. N-acetyl galactosamine-conjugated antisense drug to APOC3 mRNA, triglycerides and atherogenic lipoprotein levels. Eur Heart J 2019;40:2785-9.
14. Tardif JC, Karwatowska-Prokopczuk E, Amour ES, et al. Apolipoprotein C-III reduction in subjects with moderate hypertriglyceridaemia and at high cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J 2022;43:1401-12.
15. Bergmark BA, Marston NA, Prohaska TA, et al. Olezarsen for hypertriglyceridemia in patients at high cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med 2024; DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2402309.
16. Stroes ESG, Alexander VJ, Karwatowska-Prokopczuk E, et al. Olezarsen, acute pancreatitis, and familial chylomicronemia syndrome. N Engl J Med 2024; DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2400201.
17. Nissen SE, Wolski K, Watts GF, et al. Single ascending and multiple-dose trial of zerlasiran, a short interfering RNA targeting Lipoprotein(a). JAMA 2024; doi:10.1001/jama.2024.4504
18. Faaborg-Andersen CC, Cho SMJ, Trends and disparities in lipoprotein(a) testing in a large integrated U.S. health system, 2000-2023. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2024 Apr 25:zwae155. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae155. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38662783.