DEFINING TOMORROW'S VASCULAR STRATEGIES
×
Register now to R3i !
Your login
Your password
Confirm your password
Your email
I agree to receive the R3i newsletter
Mar 2024
The microvascular-macrovascular interplay: the next target?
Jan 2024
Targeting residual cardiovascular risk: what’s in the pipeline?
Sep 2023
Remnant cholesterol – evolving evidence
Jul 2023
Call to action on residual stroke risk
Apr 2023
Residual risk in 2023: where to?
Dec 2022
Lipid-related residual risk: lessons from PROMINENT?
Sep 2022
Residual cardiovascular risk: is apolipoprotein B the preferred marker?
Jul 2022
Residual vascular risk in chronic kidney disease: new options on the horizon
Feb 2022
Looking back at 2021 – what made the news?
Nov 2021
New ACC guidance addresses unmet clinical needs for high-risk patients with mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia
Sep 2021
Residual vascular risk: What matters?
Aug 2021
Understanding vein graft failure: a role for PPARalpha in pathobiology
May 2021
Residual cardiovascular risk: how to identify?
Apr 2021
Metabolic syndrome and COVID-19
Mar 2021
Elevated triglyceride: linking ASCVD and dementia
Feb 2021
Does SPPARMα offer new opportunities in metabolic syndrome and NAFLD?
Jan 2021
Omega-3 fatty acids for residual cardiovascular risk: more questions than answers
Oct 2020
Targeting triglycerides: Novel agents expand the field
Jul 2020
Why multidrug approaches are needed in NASH: insights with pemafibrate
Jun 2020
Triglyceride-rich remnant lipoproteins: a new therapeutic target in aortic valve stenosis?
Mar 2020
Lowering triglycerides or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: which provides greater clinical benefit?
Feb 2020
The omega-3 fatty acid conundrum
Dec 2019
Focus on stroke: more input to address residual cardiovascular risk
Jul 2019
International Expert Consensus on Selective Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha Modulator (SPPARMα): New opportunities for targeting modifiable residual cardiovascular risk
Jul 2018
The clinical gap for managing residual cardiovascular risk: will new approaches make the difference?
Apr 2018
Residual cardiovascular risk: refocus on a multifactorial approach
Feb 2018
Optimizing treatment benefit: the tenet of personalized medicine
Jan 2018
Addressing residual cardiovascular risk – back to basics?
Dec 2017
Residual risk of heart failure: how to address this global epidemic?
Oct 2017
Remnants and residual cardiovascular risk: triglycerides or cholesterol?
Jul 2017
Targeting residual cardiovascular risk: lipids and beyond…
Jun 2017
Why we need to re-focus on Latin America.
Apr 2017
Residual cardiovascular risk in the Middle East: a perfect storm in the making
Feb 2017
A global call to action on residual cardiovascular risk
Dec 2016
SPPARM?: more than one way to tackle residual risk
Oct 2016
Remnants linked with diabetic myocardial dysfunction
Sep 2016
New study links elevated triglycerides with plaque progression
Aug 2016
Atherogenic dyslipidaemia: a risk factor for silent coronary artery disease
Jul 2016
SPPARM?: a concept becomes clinical reality
Jun 2016
Remnant cholesterol back in the news
May 2016
Back to the future: triglycerides revisited
Apr 2016
Unravelling the heritability of triglycerides and coronary risk
Mar 2016
Will residual cardiovascular risk meet its nemesis in 2016?
Feb 2016
Tackling residual cardiovascular risk: a case for targeting postprandial triglycerides?
Jan 2016
Looking back at 2015: lipid highlights
Dec 2015
Legacy effects in cardiovascular prevention
Nov 2015
Residual cardiovascular risk: it’s not just lipids!
Oct 2015
Addressing residual vascular risk: beyond pharmacotherapy
Sep 2015
Back to basics: triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, remnants and residual vascular risk
Jul 2015
Beyond the PCSK9 decade: what's next?
Jun 2015
Targeting triglycerides: what lies on the horizon for novel therapies?
May 2015
Do we need new lipid biomarkers for residual cardiovascular risk?
Apr 2015
The Residual Risk Debate Hots Up: Lowering LDL-C or lowering remnant cholesterol?
Mar 2015
Call for action on stroke
Feb 2015
Triglycerides: the tide has turned
Jan 2015
Post IMPROVE-IT: Where to now for residual risk?
Dec 2014
R3i publishes new Call to Action paper: Residual Microvascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes in 2014: Is it Time for a Re-Think?
Sep 2014
Targeting residual vascular risk: round-up from ESC Congress 2014 and beyond
Jul 2014
Lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk: a new therapeutic target on the horizon
Mar 2014
Non-HDL-C and residual cardiovascular risk: the Lp(a) perspective
Feb 2014
REALIST Micro, atherogenic dyslipidaemia and residual microvascular risk
Jan 2014
Looking back at 2013: what have we learned about residual vascular risk?
Dec 2013
Long-overdue US guidelines for lipid management oversimplify the evidence
Nov 2013
Triglycerides and residual cardiovascular risk: where now?
Oct 2013
How to target residual cardiovascular risk?
Sep 2013
The Residual Vascular Risk Conundrum: Why we should target atherogenic dyslipidaemia
Jul 2013
Targeting atherogenic dyslipidemia: we need to do better
Apr 2013
Is PCSK9- targeted therapy the new hope for residual risk?
Mar 2013
Scope for multifocal approaches for reducing residual cardiovascular risk?
Feb 2013
Renewing the R3i call to action: Now more than ever we need to target and treat residual cardiovascular risk
Jan 2013
Time for a re-think on guidelines to reduce residual microvascular risk in diabetes?
Jan 2013
Addressing the residual burden of CVD in renal impairment: do PPARa agonists provide an answer?
Jan 2013
Re-evaluating options for residual risk post-HPS2-THRIVE : are SPPARMs the answer?
Dec 2012
Dysfunctional HDL: an additional target for reducing residual risk
Nov 2012
Egg consumption: a hidden residual risk factor
Oct 2012
Call to action: re-emphasising the importance of targeting residual vascular risk
Jun 2012
Time to prioritise atherogenic dyslipidaemia to reduce residual microvascular risk?
Jan 2012
Residual vascular risk in chronic kidney disease: an overlooked high-risk group
Dec 2011
Introducing the HDL Resource Center: HDL science now available for clinicians
Oct 2011
Targeting reverse cholesterol transport: the future of residual vascular risk reduction?
Sep 2011
After SPARCL: Targeting cardio-cerebrovascular metabolic risk and thrombosis to reduce residual risk of stroke
Jul 2011
Challenging the conventional wisdom: Lessons from the FIELD study on diabetic nephropathy
Jul 2010
ACCORD Eye Study: a milestone in residual microvascular risk reduction for patients with type 2 diabetes
May 2010
Lipids and residual risk of coronary heart disease in statin-treated patients
Mar 2010
ACCORD Lipid Study brings new hope to people with type 2 diabetes and atherogenic dyslipidemia
Mar 2010
Reducing residual risk of diabetic nephropathy: the role of lipoproteins
Dec 2009
ARBITER 6-HALTS: Implications for residual cardiovascular risk
Nov 2009
Microvascular event risk reduction in type 2 diabetes: New evidence from the FIELD study
Aug 2009
Fasting versus nonfasting triglycerides: Importance of triglyceride-regulating genetic polymorphisms to residual cardiovascular risk
Jul 2009
Residual risk of microvascular complications of diabetes: is intensive multitherapy the solution?
Apr 2009
Reducing residual vascular risk: modifiable and non modifiable residual vascular risk factors
Jan 2009
Micro- and macrovascular residual risk: one of the most challenging health problems of the moment
Nov 2008
Treated dyslipidemic patients remain at high residual risk of vascular events

R3i Editorial

6 November 2018
Residual cardiovascular risk: triglyceride metabolism and genetics provide a key
Prof. Jean Charles Fruchart, Prof. Michel Hermans, Prof. Pierre Amarenco
An Editorial from the R3i Trustees
 
Prof. Jean Charles Fruchart, Prof. Michel Hermans, Prof. Pierre Amarenco Understanding the major contributors to residual cardiovascular risk has been a tedious business. With the failure of major studies such as AIM-HIGH with niacin, and dal-OUTCOMES and ACCELERATE with the cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors dalcetrapib and evacetrapib, the relevance of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) has been consigned to history. Instead, researchers have refocused their attention on triglycerides (TG), given long-standing evidence for an association with increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, as TG are metabolized by most cells in the body, it is what they represent that is most relevant.

This month’s Focus report emphasizes this issue.1 High TG are actually a surrogate for elevated levels of TG-rich lipoproteins and their remnants. Increased production and delayed catabolism of TG-rich lipoproteins lead to increases in TG-enriched remnants, as well as in remnant cholesterol. Lipases, their activators (such as apolipoprotein [apo] CII and apoAV ) and their inhibitors (such as apoCIII and angiopoietin-like protein [ANGPTL] 4), and ligands for receptors involved in clearance of TG-rich lipoproteins (apoB and apoE) all play an important role in triglyceride metabolism. Indeed, insights from genetic studies have been instrumental in ‘demystifying’ the relevance of TG-rich lipoprotein metabolism to cardiovascular risk.

Much of this renewed focus has been on the atherogenic potential of remnant lipoprotein cholesterol. Accumulating evidence from observational and Mendelian randomization studies clearly supports a causal association between remnant cholesterol and risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.(2-5) However, as researchers in the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) study suggest, other TG-enriched lipoproteins may be relevant. Notably, the ARIC researchers have provided results to suggest that TG-enriched low-density lipoprotein (LDL-TG), arising from cholesteryl ester transfer protein–mediated transfer of TG from chylomicrons and very low-density lipoprotein to LDLs, in exchange for cholesteryl esters, may also play a role.

Until recently, measuring LDL-TG has been complex, and thus investigation of its relevance to cardiovascular risk has had mixed results.6,7 What is new from the ARIC study are encouraging data showing a significant association of LDL-TG with both ischaemic stroke and coronary heart disease events, even after adjustment for traditional risk factors including lipids. The ARIC investigators suggest that while both remnant cholesterol and LDL-TG are markers of remnant lipoprotein metabolism, LDL-TG may represent a preferable indicator for atherogenic altered remnant metabolism. Indeed, the shorter half-life of chylomicron and VLDL remnants compared with that of LDLs adds weight to this suggestion. Therefore, in a primary prevention setting, as in the ARIC population, inclusion of LDL-TG measurement may offer additional information for risk prediction.

Although the results from ARIC require corroboration, they are clearly thought-provoking. Is LDL-TG causal for cardiovascular disease? Should we also consider LDL-TG in risk assessment, or as a potential target for therapeutic intervention? Clearly much remains to be done to elucidate the answers to these pertinent questions. In the meantime, evidence for a role of TG-rich lipoprotein remnants and remnant cholesterol in residual cardiovascular risk continues to strengthen; we now await definitive answers as to whether targeting these parameters can reduce cardiovascular events in outcomes studies such as PROMINENT with pemafibrate, a first in class selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha modulator (SPPARM).8 Indeed, topline data from the REDUCE-IT study9 showing a 25% reduction in major cardiovascular events with high-dose eicosapentaenoic acid are pivotal in supporting the case for TG-rich lipoproteins as a key contributor to residual cardiovascular risk. All ears will be tuned to the forthcoming American Heart Association Scientific Sessions this November for full details from this major study.

References

1. Saeed A, Feofanova EV, Yu B et al. Remnant-like particle cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein triglycerides, and incident cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:156–69.
2. Varbo A, Benn M, Nordestgaard BG. Remnant cholesterol as a cause of ischemic heart disease: evidence, definition, measurement, atherogenicity, high risk patients, and present and future treatment. Pharmacol Ther 2014;141:358-67.
3. Varbo A, Nordestgaard BG. Remnant cholesterol and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in atherosclerosis progression and cardiovascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2016;36:2133–5.
4. Varbo A, Benn M, Tybjaerg-Hansen A et al. Remnant cholesterol as a causal risk factor for ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:427–36.
5. Joshi PH, Khokhar AA, Massaro JM, et al. Remnant lipoprotein cholesterol and incident coronary heart disease: the Jackson Heart and Framingham Offspring Cohort Studies. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5:e002765.
6. Albers JJ, Slee A, Fleg JL et al. Relationship of baseline HDL subclasses, small dense LDL and LDL triglyceride to cardiovascular events in the AIM-HIGH clinical trial. Atherosclerosis 2016;251:454–9.
7. Marz W, Scharnagl H, Winkler K, et al. Low density lipoprotein triglycerides associated with low-grade systemic inflammation, adhesion molecules, and angiographic coronary artery disease: the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health study. Circulation 2004;110:3068–74.
8. Pemafibrate to Reduce Cardiovascular OutcoMes by Reducing Triglycerides IN patiENts With diabeTes (PROMINENT) (PROMINENT). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03071692
9. REDUCE-IT™ Cardiovascular Outcomes Study of Vascepa® (icosapent ethyl) Capsules Met Primary Endpoint. Press release Sep 24th, 2018. http://investor.amarincorp.com/news-releases/news-release-details/reduce-ittm-cardiovascular-outcomes-study-vascepar-icosapent

Key words: residual cardiovascular risk; triglyceride-rich lipoproteins; remnants; low-density lipoprotein-triglycerides; ARIC study; risk prediction
?>