DEFINING TOMORROW'S VASCULAR STRATEGIES
×
Register now to R3i !
Your login
Your password
Confirm your password
Your email
I agree to receive the R3i newsletter
Mar 2024
The microvascular-macrovascular interplay: the next target?
Jan 2024
Targeting residual cardiovascular risk: what’s in the pipeline?
Sep 2023
Remnant cholesterol – evolving evidence
Jul 2023
Call to action on residual stroke risk
Apr 2023
Residual risk in 2023: where to?
Dec 2022
Lipid-related residual risk: lessons from PROMINENT?
Sep 2022
Residual cardiovascular risk: is apolipoprotein B the preferred marker?
Jul 2022
Residual vascular risk in chronic kidney disease: new options on the horizon
Feb 2022
Looking back at 2021 – what made the news?
Nov 2021
New ACC guidance addresses unmet clinical needs for high-risk patients with mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia
Sep 2021
Residual vascular risk: What matters?
Aug 2021
Understanding vein graft failure: a role for PPARalpha in pathobiology
May 2021
Residual cardiovascular risk: how to identify?
Apr 2021
Metabolic syndrome and COVID-19
Mar 2021
Elevated triglyceride: linking ASCVD and dementia
Feb 2021
Does SPPARMα offer new opportunities in metabolic syndrome and NAFLD?
Jan 2021
Omega-3 fatty acids for residual cardiovascular risk: more questions than answers
Oct 2020
Targeting triglycerides: Novel agents expand the field
Jul 2020
Why multidrug approaches are needed in NASH: insights with pemafibrate
Jun 2020
Triglyceride-rich remnant lipoproteins: a new therapeutic target in aortic valve stenosis?
Mar 2020
Lowering triglycerides or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: which provides greater clinical benefit?
Feb 2020
The omega-3 fatty acid conundrum
Dec 2019
Focus on stroke: more input to address residual cardiovascular risk
Jul 2019
International Expert Consensus on Selective Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha Modulator (SPPARMα): New opportunities for targeting modifiable residual cardiovascular risk
Nov 2018
Residual cardiovascular risk: triglyceride metabolism and genetics provide a key
Jul 2018
The clinical gap for managing residual cardiovascular risk: will new approaches make the difference?
Apr 2018
Residual cardiovascular risk: refocus on a multifactorial approach
Feb 2018
Optimizing treatment benefit: the tenet of personalized medicine
Jan 2018
Addressing residual cardiovascular risk – back to basics?
Dec 2017
Residual risk of heart failure: how to address this global epidemic?
Oct 2017
Remnants and residual cardiovascular risk: triglycerides or cholesterol?
Jul 2017
Targeting residual cardiovascular risk: lipids and beyond…
Jun 2017
Why we need to re-focus on Latin America.
Apr 2017
Residual cardiovascular risk in the Middle East: a perfect storm in the making
Feb 2017
A global call to action on residual cardiovascular risk
Dec 2016
SPPARM?: more than one way to tackle residual risk
Oct 2016
Remnants linked with diabetic myocardial dysfunction
Sep 2016
New study links elevated triglycerides with plaque progression
Aug 2016
Atherogenic dyslipidaemia: a risk factor for silent coronary artery disease
Jun 2016
Remnant cholesterol back in the news
May 2016
Back to the future: triglycerides revisited
Apr 2016
Unravelling the heritability of triglycerides and coronary risk
Mar 2016
Will residual cardiovascular risk meet its nemesis in 2016?
Feb 2016
Tackling residual cardiovascular risk: a case for targeting postprandial triglycerides?
Jan 2016
Looking back at 2015: lipid highlights
Dec 2015
Legacy effects in cardiovascular prevention
Nov 2015
Residual cardiovascular risk: it’s not just lipids!
Oct 2015
Addressing residual vascular risk: beyond pharmacotherapy
Sep 2015
Back to basics: triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, remnants and residual vascular risk
Jul 2015
Beyond the PCSK9 decade: what's next?
Jun 2015
Targeting triglycerides: what lies on the horizon for novel therapies?
May 2015
Do we need new lipid biomarkers for residual cardiovascular risk?
Apr 2015
The Residual Risk Debate Hots Up: Lowering LDL-C or lowering remnant cholesterol?
Mar 2015
Call for action on stroke
Feb 2015
Triglycerides: the tide has turned
Jan 2015
Post IMPROVE-IT: Where to now for residual risk?
Dec 2014
R3i publishes new Call to Action paper: Residual Microvascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes in 2014: Is it Time for a Re-Think?
Sep 2014
Targeting residual vascular risk: round-up from ESC Congress 2014 and beyond
Jul 2014
Lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk: a new therapeutic target on the horizon
Mar 2014
Non-HDL-C and residual cardiovascular risk: the Lp(a) perspective
Feb 2014
REALIST Micro, atherogenic dyslipidaemia and residual microvascular risk
Jan 2014
Looking back at 2013: what have we learned about residual vascular risk?
Dec 2013
Long-overdue US guidelines for lipid management oversimplify the evidence
Nov 2013
Triglycerides and residual cardiovascular risk: where now?
Oct 2013
How to target residual cardiovascular risk?
Sep 2013
The Residual Vascular Risk Conundrum: Why we should target atherogenic dyslipidaemia
Jul 2013
Targeting atherogenic dyslipidemia: we need to do better
Apr 2013
Is PCSK9- targeted therapy the new hope for residual risk?
Mar 2013
Scope for multifocal approaches for reducing residual cardiovascular risk?
Feb 2013
Renewing the R3i call to action: Now more than ever we need to target and treat residual cardiovascular risk
Jan 2013
Time for a re-think on guidelines to reduce residual microvascular risk in diabetes?
Jan 2013
Addressing the residual burden of CVD in renal impairment: do PPARa agonists provide an answer?
Jan 2013
Re-evaluating options for residual risk post-HPS2-THRIVE : are SPPARMs the answer?
Dec 2012
Dysfunctional HDL: an additional target for reducing residual risk
Nov 2012
Egg consumption: a hidden residual risk factor
Oct 2012
Call to action: re-emphasising the importance of targeting residual vascular risk
Jun 2012
Time to prioritise atherogenic dyslipidaemia to reduce residual microvascular risk?
Jan 2012
Residual vascular risk in chronic kidney disease: an overlooked high-risk group
Dec 2011
Introducing the HDL Resource Center: HDL science now available for clinicians
Oct 2011
Targeting reverse cholesterol transport: the future of residual vascular risk reduction?
Sep 2011
After SPARCL: Targeting cardio-cerebrovascular metabolic risk and thrombosis to reduce residual risk of stroke
Jul 2011
Challenging the conventional wisdom: Lessons from the FIELD study on diabetic nephropathy
Jul 2010
ACCORD Eye Study: a milestone in residual microvascular risk reduction for patients with type 2 diabetes
May 2010
Lipids and residual risk of coronary heart disease in statin-treated patients
Mar 2010
ACCORD Lipid Study brings new hope to people with type 2 diabetes and atherogenic dyslipidemia
Mar 2010
Reducing residual risk of diabetic nephropathy: the role of lipoproteins
Dec 2009
ARBITER 6-HALTS: Implications for residual cardiovascular risk
Nov 2009
Microvascular event risk reduction in type 2 diabetes: New evidence from the FIELD study
Aug 2009
Fasting versus nonfasting triglycerides: Importance of triglyceride-regulating genetic polymorphisms to residual cardiovascular risk
Jul 2009
Residual risk of microvascular complications of diabetes: is intensive multitherapy the solution?
Apr 2009
Reducing residual vascular risk: modifiable and non modifiable residual vascular risk factors
Jan 2009
Micro- and macrovascular residual risk: one of the most challenging health problems of the moment
Nov 2008
Treated dyslipidemic patients remain at high residual risk of vascular events

R3i Editorial

19 July 2016
SPPARM?: a concept becomes clinical reality
Prof. Jean Charles Fruchart, Prof. Michel Hermans, Prof. Pierre Amarenco
An Editorial from the R3i Trustees
 
Prof. Jean Charles Fruchart, Prof. Michel Hermans, Prof. Pierre Amarenco Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR?) agonists – fibrates – are perhaps the best option among available agents for managing atherogenic dyslipidaemia, a key contributor to lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk.1 However, this benefit is not without downsides, notably the potential for elevation in serum creatinine and liver enzymes, as well as precautions for their use in renal disease. To counter these effects, it has been proposed that modifying the receptor–cofactor binding profile of the PPAR ligand may result in improved potency and tissue selectivity, and at the same time limit potentially deleterious adverse effects.2 This selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor modulator alpha (SPPARM?) concept has been much lauded. Pre-clinical studies have shown that improved PPAR? selectivity and potency (more than 2,500-fold compared with fenofibrate) with the first in class SPPARM? K-877 (pemafibrate) resulted in enhanced triglyceride lowering and elevation in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), compared with fenofibrate.3-5

Do these pre-clinical data translate to the clinic?

This month’s Focus report highlights data from the first published phase II trial with this novel agent that bear out the SPPARM? concept.6 This trial from Japan investigated the effects of K-877 in the patient population most likely to derive benefit, i.e. patients with type 2 diabetes and atherogenic dyslipidaemia, i.e. elevated triglycerides (?200 mg/dl and <500 mg/dl) and low HDLC (<55 mg/dl in women and <50 mg/dl in men). The study was primarily conducted to investigate the dose-ranging response in triglyceride lowering with K-877 (0.025, 0.05, 0.1 or 0.2 mg twice daily), and compare this with placebo and fenofibrate 100 mg once daily. As discussed in the report, treatment with K 877 resulted in significant benefit in both lowering triglycerides (by up to 43%) and raising HDL-C (by up to 21%) over this dose range, with an apparent plateau in response at the two highest doses. There was also benefit on other apoB-containing atherogenic lipoproteins, including very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, remnant cholesterol, and on apoCIII, with maximal reduction from baseline of 48%, 50% and 34%, respectively. Incidentally, K-877 also improved the activity of fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF 21), a metabolic regulator with insulin-sensitizing activity,7 although this did not translate to reduction in body weight or improvement in glucose tolerance at the doses tested.

Importantly, the adverse event profile with K 877 was similar to that observed with placebo, with no evidence to suggest an increase in the frequency of adverse events with increasing dosage. Compared with fenofibrate 100 mg daily, there was a lower frequency of liver enzyme elevation, and no increase in serum creatinine.

Next steps?

Clearly, this is still early stages in the development of this novel pharmacotherapy. We do need to bear in mind that patients receiving lipid-modifying therapy (including statins) were excluded from this phase II trial. Larger phase III studies are needed to evaluate extended treatment with K-877 in the target patient population on best evidence-based treatment including a statin, against the recommended dose of fenofibrate (200 mg daily). Provided ongoing data remain favourable, the ultimate test will be whether the addition of K-877 reduces cardiovascular events in statin-treated type 2 diabetes patients with residual atherogenic dyslipidaemia at baseline. In the last 6 months, the PROMINENT (Pemafibrate to Reduce cardiovascular OutcoMes by reducing triglycerides IN diabetic patiENTs) cardiovascular outcomes trial with K-877 has been announced. This plans to recruit 10,000 high-risk diabetic patients with and without established cardiovascular disease worldwide.

Of course, the results of PROMINENT are some years ahead. It may be possible that this novel SPPARM? may offer new potential to address the high lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk that persists despite best available lipid-modifying therapy. We shall have to wait and see.

References

1. Sacks FM, Carey VJ, Fruchart JC. Combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2010;363:692-4.
2. Fruchart JC. Selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ? modulators (SPPARM?): the next generation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ?-agonists. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2013;12:82.
3. Yamazaki Y, Abe K, Toma T et al. Design and synthesis of highly potent and selective human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha agonists. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2007;17:4689-93.
4. Raza-Iqbal S, Tanaka T, Anai M et al. Transcriptome analysis of K-877 (a Novel Selective PPAR? Modulator (SPPARM?))-regulated genes in primary human hepatocytes and the mouse liver. J Atheroscler Thromb 2015;22:754-72.
5. Masuda D, Kobayashi T, Nakaoka H et al. A novel potent and selective PPARalpha agonist, K-877, ameriolates the atherogenic profile of fasting and postprandial hypertriglyceridemia in mice. Eur Heart J 2014;35(Abstract Supplement): 904 [abstract].
6. Ishibashi S, Yamashita S, Arai H et al. Effects of K-877, a novel selective PPARa modulator (SPPARMa), in dyslipidaemic patients: A randomized, double blind, active- and placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Atherosclerosis 2016;249:36-43.
7. Bailey CJ, Tahrani AA, Barnett AH. Future glucose-lowering drugs for type 2 diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2016;4:350-9.
?>