DEFINING TOMORROW'S VASCULAR STRATEGIES
×
Register now to R3i !
Your login
Your password
Confirm your password
Your email
I agree to receive the R3i newsletter
Mar 2024
The microvascular-macrovascular interplay: the next target?
Jan 2024
Targeting residual cardiovascular risk: what’s in the pipeline?
Sep 2023
Remnant cholesterol – evolving evidence
Jul 2023
Call to action on residual stroke risk
Apr 2023
Residual risk in 2023: where to?
Dec 2022
Lipid-related residual risk: lessons from PROMINENT?
Sep 2022
Residual cardiovascular risk: is apolipoprotein B the preferred marker?
Jul 2022
Residual vascular risk in chronic kidney disease: new options on the horizon
Feb 2022
Looking back at 2021 – what made the news?
Nov 2021
New ACC guidance addresses unmet clinical needs for high-risk patients with mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia
Sep 2021
Residual vascular risk: What matters?
Aug 2021
Understanding vein graft failure: a role for PPARalpha in pathobiology
May 2021
Residual cardiovascular risk: how to identify?
Apr 2021
Metabolic syndrome and COVID-19
Mar 2021
Elevated triglyceride: linking ASCVD and dementia
Feb 2021
Does SPPARMα offer new opportunities in metabolic syndrome and NAFLD?
Jan 2021
Omega-3 fatty acids for residual cardiovascular risk: more questions than answers
Oct 2020
Targeting triglycerides: Novel agents expand the field
Jul 2020
Why multidrug approaches are needed in NASH: insights with pemafibrate
Jun 2020
Triglyceride-rich remnant lipoproteins: a new therapeutic target in aortic valve stenosis?
Mar 2020
Lowering triglycerides or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: which provides greater clinical benefit?
Feb 2020
The omega-3 fatty acid conundrum
Dec 2019
Focus on stroke: more input to address residual cardiovascular risk
Jul 2019
International Expert Consensus on Selective Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha Modulator (SPPARMα): New opportunities for targeting modifiable residual cardiovascular risk
Nov 2018
Residual cardiovascular risk: triglyceride metabolism and genetics provide a key
Jul 2018
The clinical gap for managing residual cardiovascular risk: will new approaches make the difference?
Apr 2018
Residual cardiovascular risk: refocus on a multifactorial approach
Feb 2018
Optimizing treatment benefit: the tenet of personalized medicine
Jan 2018
Addressing residual cardiovascular risk – back to basics?
Dec 2017
Residual risk of heart failure: how to address this global epidemic?
Oct 2017
Remnants and residual cardiovascular risk: triglycerides or cholesterol?
Jul 2017
Targeting residual cardiovascular risk: lipids and beyond…
Jun 2017
Why we need to re-focus on Latin America.
Apr 2017
Residual cardiovascular risk in the Middle East: a perfect storm in the making
Feb 2017
A global call to action on residual cardiovascular risk
Dec 2016
SPPARM?: more than one way to tackle residual risk
Oct 2016
Remnants linked with diabetic myocardial dysfunction
Sep 2016
New study links elevated triglycerides with plaque progression
Aug 2016
Atherogenic dyslipidaemia: a risk factor for silent coronary artery disease
Jul 2016
SPPARM?: a concept becomes clinical reality
Jun 2016
Remnant cholesterol back in the news
May 2016
Back to the future: triglycerides revisited
Apr 2016
Unravelling the heritability of triglycerides and coronary risk
Mar 2016
Will residual cardiovascular risk meet its nemesis in 2016?
Feb 2016
Tackling residual cardiovascular risk: a case for targeting postprandial triglycerides?
Jan 2016
Looking back at 2015: lipid highlights
Dec 2015
Legacy effects in cardiovascular prevention
Nov 2015
Residual cardiovascular risk: it’s not just lipids!
Oct 2015
Addressing residual vascular risk: beyond pharmacotherapy
Sep 2015
Back to basics: triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, remnants and residual vascular risk
Jul 2015
Beyond the PCSK9 decade: what's next?
Jun 2015
Targeting triglycerides: what lies on the horizon for novel therapies?
May 2015
Do we need new lipid biomarkers for residual cardiovascular risk?
Apr 2015
The Residual Risk Debate Hots Up: Lowering LDL-C or lowering remnant cholesterol?
Mar 2015
Call for action on stroke
Feb 2015
Triglycerides: the tide has turned
Jan 2015
Post IMPROVE-IT: Where to now for residual risk?
Dec 2014
R3i publishes new Call to Action paper: Residual Microvascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes in 2014: Is it Time for a Re-Think?
Sep 2014
Targeting residual vascular risk: round-up from ESC Congress 2014 and beyond
Jul 2014
Lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk: a new therapeutic target on the horizon
Mar 2014
Non-HDL-C and residual cardiovascular risk: the Lp(a) perspective
Feb 2014
REALIST Micro, atherogenic dyslipidaemia and residual microvascular risk
Jan 2014
Looking back at 2013: what have we learned about residual vascular risk?
Dec 2013
Long-overdue US guidelines for lipid management oversimplify the evidence
Nov 2013
Triglycerides and residual cardiovascular risk: where now?
Oct 2013
How to target residual cardiovascular risk?
Sep 2013
The Residual Vascular Risk Conundrum: Why we should target atherogenic dyslipidaemia
Jul 2013
Targeting atherogenic dyslipidemia: we need to do better
Apr 2013
Is PCSK9- targeted therapy the new hope for residual risk?
Mar 2013
Scope for multifocal approaches for reducing residual cardiovascular risk?
Feb 2013
Renewing the R3i call to action: Now more than ever we need to target and treat residual cardiovascular risk
Jan 2013
Time for a re-think on guidelines to reduce residual microvascular risk in diabetes?
Jan 2013
Addressing the residual burden of CVD in renal impairment: do PPARa agonists provide an answer?
Dec 2012
Dysfunctional HDL: an additional target for reducing residual risk
Nov 2012
Egg consumption: a hidden residual risk factor
Oct 2012
Call to action: re-emphasising the importance of targeting residual vascular risk
Jun 2012
Time to prioritise atherogenic dyslipidaemia to reduce residual microvascular risk?
Jan 2012
Residual vascular risk in chronic kidney disease: an overlooked high-risk group
Dec 2011
Introducing the HDL Resource Center: HDL science now available for clinicians
Oct 2011
Targeting reverse cholesterol transport: the future of residual vascular risk reduction?
Sep 2011
After SPARCL: Targeting cardio-cerebrovascular metabolic risk and thrombosis to reduce residual risk of stroke
Jul 2011
Challenging the conventional wisdom: Lessons from the FIELD study on diabetic nephropathy
Jul 2010
ACCORD Eye Study: a milestone in residual microvascular risk reduction for patients with type 2 diabetes
May 2010
Lipids and residual risk of coronary heart disease in statin-treated patients
Mar 2010
ACCORD Lipid Study brings new hope to people with type 2 diabetes and atherogenic dyslipidemia
Mar 2010
Reducing residual risk of diabetic nephropathy: the role of lipoproteins
Dec 2009
ARBITER 6-HALTS: Implications for residual cardiovascular risk
Nov 2009
Microvascular event risk reduction in type 2 diabetes: New evidence from the FIELD study
Aug 2009
Fasting versus nonfasting triglycerides: Importance of triglyceride-regulating genetic polymorphisms to residual cardiovascular risk
Jul 2009
Residual risk of microvascular complications of diabetes: is intensive multitherapy the solution?
Apr 2009
Reducing residual vascular risk: modifiable and non modifiable residual vascular risk factors
Jan 2009
Micro- and macrovascular residual risk: one of the most challenging health problems of the moment
Nov 2008
Treated dyslipidemic patients remain at high residual risk of vascular events

R3i Editorial

4 January 2013
Re-evaluating options for residual risk post-HPS2-THRIVE : are SPPARMs the answer?
Prof. JC Fruchart, Prof. J. Davignon, Prof. M Hermans
An Editorial from the R3i Trustees
 
Prof. JC Fruchart, Prof. J. Davignon, Prof. M Hermans The failure of HPS2-THRIVE has been much debated. However, it is now time to take a step back for a balanced analysis, as discussed in this month’s Focus article.

The Residual Risk Reduction Initiative (R3i) believes that recent trials with niacin highlight two key points. First, trials aimed at investigating therapeutic options for reducing residual risk clearly need to be relevant to the intended target patient population. Second, when considering data from both niacin trials, HPS2-THRIVE and AIM-HIGH, it is clear that there are unresolved issues about the use of niacin to reduce residual cardiovascular risk. Not only was there a lack of benefit, but there was also significant harm associated with niacin plus statin combination therapy.(1-3) Exacerbation of diabetes complications, and indeed the significant increase in new-onset diabetes, is a major disadvantage in the treatment of patients with insulin resistance phenotype and/or comorbidities commonly associated with atherogenic dyslipidemia.

As already discussed, the only outcomes evidence to date for therapeutic options in this setting is from the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Lipid trial with fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) agonist, specifically in patients with type 2 diabetes and atherogenic dyslipidemia (the combination of elevated triglycerides and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C]).(4) However, it is acknowledged that fenofibrate is a comparatively weak agonist of PPARα Consequently, efficacy is modest due to the need to balance the risks versus-benefits of treatment.

Will improving PPARα selectivity provide better balance?

Given that PPARα plays a key role in the regulation of lipid homeostasis, this nuclear receptor is a highly logical target in individuals with cardiometabolic disease. Thus, one line of activity has been directed to the improving the selectivity and hence potency of PPARα agonists. The selective PPARα modulator (SPPARMα) K-877 is one such agent, currently in phase II clinical development. Studies in animal models of obesity show that the triglycerides-lowering efficacy of K-877 is about 1000-fold greater than that of fenofibrate.(5) In patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia (triglycerides ≥200 mg/dL or 2.3 mmol/L and HDL-C ≤50/55 mg/dL or 1.29-1.42 mmol/L), treatment with K 877 (100-µg twice daily) was superior to fenofibrate 100 mg daily for lowering triglycerides and raising HDL-C. Importantly, the adverse effects profile with K-877 showed no evidence of any deleterious effects on markers of renal or hepatic function.(6) Further analyses also indicate that K-877 appears to suppress the postprandial increase in remnant cholesterol (non-fasting total cholesterol minus HDL-C minus LDL-C), recently shown to be a major risk factor for ischemic heart disease.(7) These early findings clearly warrant further development of this novel SPPARMα agonist.

There are also two other types of PPAR receptors: PPARδ (also called PPARβ) and PPARγ. As the latter targets include genes involved in obesity and insulin resistance, this would suggest that dual PPARα/γ agonists may offer potential in the management of patients with cardiometabolic disease. Until recently the development of such dual agonists has been plagued by safety issues, including detrimental effects on cardiovascular and renal outcomes, as well as weight gain.(8-10) The most recent dual PPARα/γ agonist - aleglitazar - may offer new potential, with studies showing enhanced effects on glucose homeostasis (versus pioglitazone), as well as improved lipid-modifying efficacy (versus fenofibrate).(11,12)

The R3i believe that the development of novel selective PPARα modulators (either as single or dual PPAR agonists) signals real promise for addressing the burden of residual vascular risk, against a background of increasing cardiometabolic disease. We look forward to results of ongoing trials with great anticipation.

References

1. HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group. HPS2-THRIVE randomized placebo-controlled trial in 25 673 high-risk patients of ER niacin/laropiprant: trial design, pre-specified muscle and liver outcomes, and reasons for stopping study treatment. Eur Heart J 2013; online ahead of print 27 February 2013.
2. HPS2-THRIVE Trial website: http://www.thrivestudy.org/
3. AIM HIGH Investigators. Boden WE, Probstfield JL, Anderson T et al. Niacin in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy. N Engl J Med 2011;365:2255-67.
4. Ginsberg HN, Elam MB, Lovato LC et al. Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1563-74.
5. Takizawa T. K-877, a highly potent and selective PPARα agonist, improves dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis in experimental animal models . Atheroscler Suppl 2012; 12:Abstr 787.
6. Ishibashi S, Arai H, Yamashita S, Araki E, Yamada N. Benefical effects of K-877, a potent and highly selective PPARα agonist, on plasma lipoprotein profile in patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia. Atheroscler Suppl 2012; 12:Abstr 525.
7. Varbo A, Benn M, Tybjærg-Hansen A, Jørgensen AB, Frikke-Schmidt R, Nordestgaard BG. Remnant cholesterol as a causal risk factor for ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:427-36.
8. Nissen SE, Wolski K, Topol EJ. Effect of muraglitazar on death and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 2005;294:2581-6.
9. Hamren B, Ohman KP, Svensson MK et al. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic assessment of the interrelationships between tesaglitazar exposure and renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Pharmacol 2012;52:1317-27.
10. Rosenson RS, Wright RS, Farkouh M, Plutzky J. Modulating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors for therapeutic benefit? Biology, clinical experience, and future prospects. Am Heart J 2012; 164:672-80.
11. Henry RR, Lincoff AM, Mudaliar S et al. Effect of the dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha/gamma agonist aleglitazar on risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes (SYNCHRONY): a phase II, randomised, dose-ranging study. Lancet 2009;374:126-35.
12. Herz M, Gaspari F, Perico N et al. Effects of high dose aleglitazar on renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Int J Cardiol 2011;151:136-42.
?>