DEFINING TOMORROW'S VASCULAR STRATEGIES
×
Register now to R3i !
Your login
Your password
Confirm your password
Your email
I agree to receive the R3i newsletter
Mar 2024
The microvascular-macrovascular interplay: the next target?
Jan 2024
Targeting residual cardiovascular risk: what’s in the pipeline?
Sep 2023
Remnant cholesterol – evolving evidence
Jul 2023
Call to action on residual stroke risk
Apr 2023
Residual risk in 2023: where to?
Dec 2022
Lipid-related residual risk: lessons from PROMINENT?
Sep 2022
Residual cardiovascular risk: is apolipoprotein B the preferred marker?
Jul 2022
Residual vascular risk in chronic kidney disease: new options on the horizon
Feb 2022
Looking back at 2021 – what made the news?
Nov 2021
New ACC guidance addresses unmet clinical needs for high-risk patients with mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia
Sep 2021
Residual vascular risk: What matters?
Aug 2021
Understanding vein graft failure: a role for PPARalpha in pathobiology
May 2021
Residual cardiovascular risk: how to identify?
Apr 2021
Metabolic syndrome and COVID-19
Mar 2021
Elevated triglyceride: linking ASCVD and dementia
Feb 2021
Does SPPARMα offer new opportunities in metabolic syndrome and NAFLD?
Jan 2021
Omega-3 fatty acids for residual cardiovascular risk: more questions than answers
Oct 2020
Targeting triglycerides: Novel agents expand the field
Jul 2020
Why multidrug approaches are needed in NASH: insights with pemafibrate
Jun 2020
Triglyceride-rich remnant lipoproteins: a new therapeutic target in aortic valve stenosis?
Mar 2020
Lowering triglycerides or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: which provides greater clinical benefit?
Feb 2020
The omega-3 fatty acid conundrum
Dec 2019
Focus on stroke: more input to address residual cardiovascular risk
Jul 2019
International Expert Consensus on Selective Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha Modulator (SPPARMα): New opportunities for targeting modifiable residual cardiovascular risk
Nov 2018
Residual cardiovascular risk: triglyceride metabolism and genetics provide a key
Jul 2018
The clinical gap for managing residual cardiovascular risk: will new approaches make the difference?
Apr 2018
Residual cardiovascular risk: refocus on a multifactorial approach
Feb 2018
Optimizing treatment benefit: the tenet of personalized medicine
Jan 2018
Addressing residual cardiovascular risk – back to basics?
Dec 2017
Residual risk of heart failure: how to address this global epidemic?
Oct 2017
Remnants and residual cardiovascular risk: triglycerides or cholesterol?
Jul 2017
Targeting residual cardiovascular risk: lipids and beyond…
Jun 2017
Why we need to re-focus on Latin America.
Apr 2017
Residual cardiovascular risk in the Middle East: a perfect storm in the making
Feb 2017
A global call to action on residual cardiovascular risk
Dec 2016
SPPARM?: more than one way to tackle residual risk
Oct 2016
Remnants linked with diabetic myocardial dysfunction
Sep 2016
New study links elevated triglycerides with plaque progression
Aug 2016
Atherogenic dyslipidaemia: a risk factor for silent coronary artery disease
Jul 2016
SPPARM?: a concept becomes clinical reality
Jun 2016
Remnant cholesterol back in the news
May 2016
Back to the future: triglycerides revisited
Mar 2016
Will residual cardiovascular risk meet its nemesis in 2016?
Feb 2016
Tackling residual cardiovascular risk: a case for targeting postprandial triglycerides?
Jan 2016
Looking back at 2015: lipid highlights
Dec 2015
Legacy effects in cardiovascular prevention
Nov 2015
Residual cardiovascular risk: it’s not just lipids!
Oct 2015
Addressing residual vascular risk: beyond pharmacotherapy
Sep 2015
Back to basics: triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, remnants and residual vascular risk
Jul 2015
Beyond the PCSK9 decade: what's next?
Jun 2015
Targeting triglycerides: what lies on the horizon for novel therapies?
May 2015
Do we need new lipid biomarkers for residual cardiovascular risk?
Apr 2015
The Residual Risk Debate Hots Up: Lowering LDL-C or lowering remnant cholesterol?
Mar 2015
Call for action on stroke
Feb 2015
Triglycerides: the tide has turned
Jan 2015
Post IMPROVE-IT: Where to now for residual risk?
Dec 2014
R3i publishes new Call to Action paper: Residual Microvascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes in 2014: Is it Time for a Re-Think?
Sep 2014
Targeting residual vascular risk: round-up from ESC Congress 2014 and beyond
Jul 2014
Lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk: a new therapeutic target on the horizon
Mar 2014
Non-HDL-C and residual cardiovascular risk: the Lp(a) perspective
Feb 2014
REALIST Micro, atherogenic dyslipidaemia and residual microvascular risk
Jan 2014
Looking back at 2013: what have we learned about residual vascular risk?
Dec 2013
Long-overdue US guidelines for lipid management oversimplify the evidence
Nov 2013
Triglycerides and residual cardiovascular risk: where now?
Oct 2013
How to target residual cardiovascular risk?
Sep 2013
The Residual Vascular Risk Conundrum: Why we should target atherogenic dyslipidaemia
Jul 2013
Targeting atherogenic dyslipidemia: we need to do better
Apr 2013
Is PCSK9- targeted therapy the new hope for residual risk?
Mar 2013
Scope for multifocal approaches for reducing residual cardiovascular risk?
Feb 2013
Renewing the R3i call to action: Now more than ever we need to target and treat residual cardiovascular risk
Jan 2013
Time for a re-think on guidelines to reduce residual microvascular risk in diabetes?
Jan 2013
Addressing the residual burden of CVD in renal impairment: do PPARa agonists provide an answer?
Jan 2013
Re-evaluating options for residual risk post-HPS2-THRIVE : are SPPARMs the answer?
Dec 2012
Dysfunctional HDL: an additional target for reducing residual risk
Nov 2012
Egg consumption: a hidden residual risk factor
Oct 2012
Call to action: re-emphasising the importance of targeting residual vascular risk
Jun 2012
Time to prioritise atherogenic dyslipidaemia to reduce residual microvascular risk?
Jan 2012
Residual vascular risk in chronic kidney disease: an overlooked high-risk group
Dec 2011
Introducing the HDL Resource Center: HDL science now available for clinicians
Oct 2011
Targeting reverse cholesterol transport: the future of residual vascular risk reduction?
Sep 2011
After SPARCL: Targeting cardio-cerebrovascular metabolic risk and thrombosis to reduce residual risk of stroke
Jul 2011
Challenging the conventional wisdom: Lessons from the FIELD study on diabetic nephropathy
Jul 2010
ACCORD Eye Study: a milestone in residual microvascular risk reduction for patients with type 2 diabetes
May 2010
Lipids and residual risk of coronary heart disease in statin-treated patients
Mar 2010
ACCORD Lipid Study brings new hope to people with type 2 diabetes and atherogenic dyslipidemia
Mar 2010
Reducing residual risk of diabetic nephropathy: the role of lipoproteins
Dec 2009
ARBITER 6-HALTS: Implications for residual cardiovascular risk
Nov 2009
Microvascular event risk reduction in type 2 diabetes: New evidence from the FIELD study
Aug 2009
Fasting versus nonfasting triglycerides: Importance of triglyceride-regulating genetic polymorphisms to residual cardiovascular risk
Jul 2009
Residual risk of microvascular complications of diabetes: is intensive multitherapy the solution?
Apr 2009
Reducing residual vascular risk: modifiable and non modifiable residual vascular risk factors
Jan 2009
Micro- and macrovascular residual risk: one of the most challenging health problems of the moment
Nov 2008
Treated dyslipidemic patients remain at high residual risk of vascular events

R3i Editorial

15 April 2016
Unravelling the heritability of triglycerides and coronary risk
Prof. Jean Charles Fruchart, Prof. Michel Hermans, Prof. Pierre Amarenco
An Editorial from the R3i Trustees
 
Prof. Jean Charles Fruchart, Prof. Michel Hermans, Prof. Pierre Amarenco Driven by genetics, elevated triglycerides, a marker of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and their remnants have regained the focus of attention. Since 2013, studies have provided consistent evidence for specific loci with an exclusive effect on triglycerides, notably variants associated with APOA5 and APOC3; these were also associated convincingly with clinical coronary artery disease and subclinical atherosclerosis.1,5 However, further elucidation of the heritability of triglycerides and their causality with cardiovascular disease was needed.

Experimental evidence in animal models has implicated a role for modulators of the functionality of lipoprotein lipase (LPL), which plays a key role in the metabolism and clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Angiopoietin-Like Protein 4 (ANGPTL4) is well recognized as an inhibitor of LPL in vitro and in vivo.6 ANGPTL4 overexpression in transgenic mouse models was shown to result in increased levels of triglycerides, whereas ANGPTL4 knockout mice had markedly decreased levels of triglycerides, as well as lower levels of very low-density lipoprotein.7,8

This month’s Focus article adds important new information, with two recent reports linking ANGPTL4 variants with triglycerides and coronary risk.(9,10) Importantly, the studies provide independent evidence that genetic loss of ANGPTL4 function confers not only favourable lipid profiles, but also protection from coronary artery disease. The magnitude of this effect, with reduction in coronary risk, by up to 53%, represents the benefit from lifelong exposure to low levels of triglycerides associated with these variants. Taken together, these studies add important insights into the heritability of elevated triglycerides and reaffirm that beyond elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, disordered metabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, mediated via the LPL pathway, is an important contributor to coronary disease risk. Thus, ANGPTL4 may represent a novel treatment target. Indeed, in the study reported by Dewey and co-workers,9 mice bred with human ANGPTL4 and ApoE deficiency and with a genetic predisposition to hypertriglyceridaemia, showed marked and sustained reduction in triglycerides after treatment with a humanized monoclonal antibody to ANGPTL4 (REGN1001). Similar triglyceride lowering effects were reported in other preclinical models. There was, however, a word of caution as to whether abdominal lymphadenopathy secondary to granulomatous lipid accumulation seen in some preclinical models, would also be an issue clinically. However, there was no evidence of this in human carriers of E40K or other inactivating mutations in ANGPTL4.

With a renewal of interest in the relevance of elevated triglycerides to cardiovascular risk, genomic data have driven the search for new therapeutic targets. Apolipoprotein CIII and latterly, ANGPLT4, are the next in line for testing. Elevated triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and their remnants are key drivers of residual cardiovascular risk.11 The relevance of this is underscored by trends for increasing levels of triglycerides in the general population; for example, in the USA data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) show that in 2010, 47% of the population had triglyceride levels >150 mg/dl, driven to a large extent by lifestyle factors.12 While statins are indisputably effective in lowering elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, evidence from the VOYAGER analysis discussed in this month’s Landmark study, show that even with high-dose, high-intensity statin therapy, about 50% of triglyceridaemic patients do not attain desirable levels (<1.7 mmol/l or 150 mg/dl).13

It is clear that we need new options; genetic and mechanistic insights have and will continue to be key to identifying novel approaches to the management of hypertriglyceridaemia and potentially, reduction in residual cardiovascular risk.

References

1. Do R, Willer CJ, Schmidt EM et al. Common variants associated with plasma triglycerides and risk for coronary artery disease. Nat Genet 2013;45:1345-52.
2. Pollin TI, Damcott CM, Shen H et al. A null mutation in human APOC3 confers a favorable plasma lipid profile and apparent cardioprotection. Science. 2008; 322:1702–5.
3. The TG and HDL Working Group of the Exome Sequencing Project. Loss-of function mutations in APOC3, triglycerides, and coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2014;371: 22-31.
4. Jørgensen AB, Frikke-Schmidt R, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjærg-Hansen A. Loss of-function mutations in APOC3 and risk of ischemic vascular disease. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 32-41.
5. Do R, Stitziel NO, Won HH et al. Exome sequencing identifies rare LDLR and APOA5 alleles conferring risk for myocardial infarction. Nature 2015; 518: 102-6.
6. Mehta N, Qamar A, Qu L et al. Differential association of plasma angiopoietin-like proteins 3 and 4 with lipid and metabolic traits. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2014;34:1057–63.
7. Yin W, Romeo S, Chang S et al. Genetic variation in angptl4 provides insights into protein processing and function. J Biol Chem 2009;284:13213–22.
8. Adachi H, Fujiwara Y, Kondo T et al. Angptl 4 deficiency improves lipid metabolism, suppresses foam cell formation and protects against atherosclerosis. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2009;379:806–11.
9. Dewey FE, Gusarova V, O’Dushlaine C et al. Inactivating variants in ANGPTL4 and risk of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1123-33.
10. Myocardial Infarction Genetics and CARDIoGRAM Exome Consortia Investigators. Coding variation in ANGPTL4, LPL, and SVEP1 and the risk of coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1134-44.
11. Nordestgaard BG. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. New insights from epidemiology, genetics, and biology. Circulation Res 2016;118:547-63.
12. Carroll MD, Kit BK, Lacher DA et al. Trends in lipids and lipoproteins in US adults, 1988-2010. JAMA 2012;308:1545–54.
13. Karlson BW, Palmer MK, Nicholls SJ et al. VOYAGER meta-analysis of the impact of statin therapy on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.
?>