DEFINING TOMORROW'S VASCULAR STRATEGIES
×
Register now to R3i !
Your login
Your password
Confirm your password
Your email
I agree to receive the R3i newsletter
Mar 2024
The microvascular-macrovascular interplay: the next target?
Jan 2024
Targeting residual cardiovascular risk: what’s in the pipeline?
Sep 2023
Remnant cholesterol – evolving evidence
Jul 2023
Call to action on residual stroke risk
Apr 2023
Residual risk in 2023: where to?
Dec 2022
Lipid-related residual risk: lessons from PROMINENT?
Sep 2022
Residual cardiovascular risk: is apolipoprotein B the preferred marker?
Jul 2022
Residual vascular risk in chronic kidney disease: new options on the horizon
Feb 2022
Looking back at 2021 – what made the news?
Nov 2021
New ACC guidance addresses unmet clinical needs for high-risk patients with mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia
Sep 2021
Residual vascular risk: What matters?
Aug 2021
Understanding vein graft failure: a role for PPARalpha in pathobiology
May 2021
Residual cardiovascular risk: how to identify?
Apr 2021
Metabolic syndrome and COVID-19
Mar 2021
Elevated triglyceride: linking ASCVD and dementia
Feb 2021
Does SPPARMα offer new opportunities in metabolic syndrome and NAFLD?
Jan 2021
Omega-3 fatty acids for residual cardiovascular risk: more questions than answers
Oct 2020
Targeting triglycerides: Novel agents expand the field
Jul 2020
Why multidrug approaches are needed in NASH: insights with pemafibrate
Jun 2020
Triglyceride-rich remnant lipoproteins: a new therapeutic target in aortic valve stenosis?
Mar 2020
Lowering triglycerides or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: which provides greater clinical benefit?
Feb 2020
The omega-3 fatty acid conundrum
Dec 2019
Focus on stroke: more input to address residual cardiovascular risk
Jul 2019
International Expert Consensus on Selective Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha Modulator (SPPARMα): New opportunities for targeting modifiable residual cardiovascular risk
Nov 2018
Residual cardiovascular risk: triglyceride metabolism and genetics provide a key
Jul 2018
The clinical gap for managing residual cardiovascular risk: will new approaches make the difference?
Apr 2018
Residual cardiovascular risk: refocus on a multifactorial approach
Feb 2018
Optimizing treatment benefit: the tenet of personalized medicine
Jan 2018
Addressing residual cardiovascular risk – back to basics?
Dec 2017
Residual risk of heart failure: how to address this global epidemic?
Oct 2017
Remnants and residual cardiovascular risk: triglycerides or cholesterol?
Jul 2017
Targeting residual cardiovascular risk: lipids and beyond…
Jun 2017
Why we need to re-focus on Latin America.
Apr 2017
Residual cardiovascular risk in the Middle East: a perfect storm in the making
Feb 2017
A global call to action on residual cardiovascular risk
Dec 2016
SPPARM?: more than one way to tackle residual risk
Oct 2016
Remnants linked with diabetic myocardial dysfunction
Sep 2016
New study links elevated triglycerides with plaque progression
Aug 2016
Atherogenic dyslipidaemia: a risk factor for silent coronary artery disease
Jul 2016
SPPARM?: a concept becomes clinical reality
Jun 2016
Remnant cholesterol back in the news
May 2016
Back to the future: triglycerides revisited
Apr 2016
Unravelling the heritability of triglycerides and coronary risk
Mar 2016
Will residual cardiovascular risk meet its nemesis in 2016?
Feb 2016
Tackling residual cardiovascular risk: a case for targeting postprandial triglycerides?
Dec 2015
Legacy effects in cardiovascular prevention
Nov 2015
Residual cardiovascular risk: it’s not just lipids!
Oct 2015
Addressing residual vascular risk: beyond pharmacotherapy
Sep 2015
Back to basics: triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, remnants and residual vascular risk
Jul 2015
Beyond the PCSK9 decade: what's next?
Jun 2015
Targeting triglycerides: what lies on the horizon for novel therapies?
May 2015
Do we need new lipid biomarkers for residual cardiovascular risk?
Apr 2015
The Residual Risk Debate Hots Up: Lowering LDL-C or lowering remnant cholesterol?
Mar 2015
Call for action on stroke
Feb 2015
Triglycerides: the tide has turned
Jan 2015
Post IMPROVE-IT: Where to now for residual risk?
Dec 2014
R3i publishes new Call to Action paper: Residual Microvascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes in 2014: Is it Time for a Re-Think?
Sep 2014
Targeting residual vascular risk: round-up from ESC Congress 2014 and beyond
Jul 2014
Lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk: a new therapeutic target on the horizon
Mar 2014
Non-HDL-C and residual cardiovascular risk: the Lp(a) perspective
Feb 2014
REALIST Micro, atherogenic dyslipidaemia and residual microvascular risk
Jan 2014
Looking back at 2013: what have we learned about residual vascular risk?
Dec 2013
Long-overdue US guidelines for lipid management oversimplify the evidence
Nov 2013
Triglycerides and residual cardiovascular risk: where now?
Oct 2013
How to target residual cardiovascular risk?
Sep 2013
The Residual Vascular Risk Conundrum: Why we should target atherogenic dyslipidaemia
Jul 2013
Targeting atherogenic dyslipidemia: we need to do better
Apr 2013
Is PCSK9- targeted therapy the new hope for residual risk?
Mar 2013
Scope for multifocal approaches for reducing residual cardiovascular risk?
Feb 2013
Renewing the R3i call to action: Now more than ever we need to target and treat residual cardiovascular risk
Jan 2013
Time for a re-think on guidelines to reduce residual microvascular risk in diabetes?
Jan 2013
Addressing the residual burden of CVD in renal impairment: do PPARa agonists provide an answer?
Jan 2013
Re-evaluating options for residual risk post-HPS2-THRIVE : are SPPARMs the answer?
Dec 2012
Dysfunctional HDL: an additional target for reducing residual risk
Nov 2012
Egg consumption: a hidden residual risk factor
Oct 2012
Call to action: re-emphasising the importance of targeting residual vascular risk
Jun 2012
Time to prioritise atherogenic dyslipidaemia to reduce residual microvascular risk?
Jan 2012
Residual vascular risk in chronic kidney disease: an overlooked high-risk group
Dec 2011
Introducing the HDL Resource Center: HDL science now available for clinicians
Oct 2011
Targeting reverse cholesterol transport: the future of residual vascular risk reduction?
Sep 2011
After SPARCL: Targeting cardio-cerebrovascular metabolic risk and thrombosis to reduce residual risk of stroke
Jul 2011
Challenging the conventional wisdom: Lessons from the FIELD study on diabetic nephropathy
Jul 2010
ACCORD Eye Study: a milestone in residual microvascular risk reduction for patients with type 2 diabetes
May 2010
Lipids and residual risk of coronary heart disease in statin-treated patients
Mar 2010
ACCORD Lipid Study brings new hope to people with type 2 diabetes and atherogenic dyslipidemia
Mar 2010
Reducing residual risk of diabetic nephropathy: the role of lipoproteins
Dec 2009
ARBITER 6-HALTS: Implications for residual cardiovascular risk
Nov 2009
Microvascular event risk reduction in type 2 diabetes: New evidence from the FIELD study
Aug 2009
Fasting versus nonfasting triglycerides: Importance of triglyceride-regulating genetic polymorphisms to residual cardiovascular risk
Jul 2009
Residual risk of microvascular complications of diabetes: is intensive multitherapy the solution?
Apr 2009
Reducing residual vascular risk: modifiable and non modifiable residual vascular risk factors
Jan 2009
Micro- and macrovascular residual risk: one of the most challenging health problems of the moment
Nov 2008
Treated dyslipidemic patients remain at high residual risk of vascular events

R3i Editorial

11 January 2016
Looking back at 2015: lipid highlights
Prof. Jean Charles Fruchart, Prof. Michel Hermans, Prof. Pierre Amarenco
An Editorial from the R3i Trustees
 
Prof. Jean Charles Fruchart, Prof. Michel Hermans, Prof. Pierre Amarenco The last 12 months has been an exciting time for lipid research, led by the advance of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) targeted therapy. Indeed, the American Heart Association (AHA) has cited the PCSK9 inhibitors alirocumab and evolocumab as two of the top 10 research advances of 2015 1. Preliminary data in March suggested that PCSK9 monoclonal antibody therapy, on top of statin, reduced major cardiovascular events by about 50% in high cardiovascular risk patients 2,3. Despite the lack of definitive outcomes data, the first two agents in this class were licensed in Europe and the USA earlier this year. With the first of the outcomes studies with these agents (evolocumab) due to report in late 2016, we will finally be able to evaluate whether these novel agents can reduce lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk that persists despite statin therapy.

While these agents predominantly target low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, effects on other lipoproteins are not negligible. Indeed, a focus of interest has been reduction in lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], an established cardiovascular risk factor and potential contributor to lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk 4,5. Available data indicate that PCSK9 monoclonal antibody therapy lowers Lp(a) by 25-30% across the spectrum of high cardiovascular risk patients 6,7. As Lp(a) is essentially refractory to current treatment options (beyond niacin, currently only available in the Americas), PCSK9 targeted therapy may therefore offer the possibility to target this atherothrombogenic lipoprotein. However, other novel agents are also in development, most notably ISIS-APO(a)Rx, a second-generation antisense drug targeting apolipoprotein(a), a component of Lp(a). A phase I trial in subjects with elevated Lp(a) >25 nmol/L has shown reduction in Lp(a) of more than 80% after multiple dosing. With a favourable safety profile to date, these findings therefore provide a strong rationale for continued development 8. Thus, the future may offer the possibility of testing whether targeting elevated Lp(a) reduces lipid-related cardiovascular risk.

Other developments offer new hope for addressing atherogenic dyslipidaemia, so far undertreated, as highlighted in this month’s Landmark report. Apolipoprotein (apo) CIII, a key player in the metabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, is one potential target for intervention, supported by genetic insights that carriage of loss-of-function variants of the gene encoding apoCIII (APOC3) was associated with reduced risk of subclinical atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease 9,10. Additionally, in individuals with type 2 diabetes, increased plasma apoCIII concentration was associated with higher triglyceride levels, less favourable cardiometabolic phenotypes, and higher coronary artery calcification, a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis 11. These emerging lines of evidence have been drivers for the development of a second-generation antisense inhibitor of apoCIII synthesis (ISIS 304801). In a phase II study in individuals with baseline triglycerides 4-22.6 mmol/L (350-2000 mg/dl), treatment with ISIS 304801 (either alone or with a fibrate) resulted in reduction in plasma apoCIII levels by up to 80%, with a similar decrease in plasma triglycerides 12. Given a favourable safety profile to date, further development is merited.

Another option of critical interest is the development of selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR?) modulators (SPPARMs), which overcome issues related to potency and selectivity with current PPAR? agonists (fibrates). The SPPARM? K-877 (Kowa Limited), filed in Japan and in Phase II/III development in Europe and beyond, has been shown to be effective in managing atherogenic dyslipidaemia and residual hypertriglyceridaemia, especially in individuals with type 2 diabetes, with no evidence of elevation in serum creatinine, or clinically meaningful adverse effects on renal or hepatic function during treatment for up to 24 weeks 13-15. Clearly, an agent to watch for the future.

However, 2015 has also had its share of disappointments. Perhaps the most newsworthy has been the termination of yet another cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor, evacetrapib. The phase III cardiovascular outcomes study ACCELERATE was closed on the recommendation of the Independent Data Monitoring Committee following periodic data reviews which suggested there was a low probability the study would achieve its primary endpoint. Evacetrapib was not terminated due to safety issues 16. Anacetrapib remains the last CETP inhibitor in Phase III development. Merck recently issued a release confirming that following a planned review of unblinded study the Data Monitoring Committee of the REVEAL study recommended the study continue with no changes 17.

All of these developments augur for an exciting time for lipid research in the next 1-2 years, with outcomes data available from studies with the PCSK9 inhibitors and anacetrapib. However, it is also important to reaffirm the importance of lifestyle intervention, given that the pandemic of obesity and type 2 diabetes has been largely driven by poor diet and sedentary lifestyle. Not only does lifestyle intervention significantly reduce the development of type 2 diabetes, but also there is also evidence that improvement in the control of just one of seven major modifiable cardiovascular risk factors resulted in 6% reduction in the risk of a cardiovascular event over the following 4 years 18,19. Clearly a renewed focus on lifestyle is the critical foundation to pharmacotherapeutic intervention targeting residual cardiovascular risk.

On this final note, the Editors wish all readers the very best for 2016 – and look forward to exciting news from forthcoming developments in lipid research.

References

1. AHA names two injectable PCSK9 inhibitors among 2015's top research advances. http://patientdaily.com/stories/510654421-aha-names-two-injectable-pcsk9-inhibitors-among-2015-s-top-research-advances
2. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Wiviott SD, et al. Efficacy and safety of evolocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:1500-9.
3. Robinson JG, Farnier M, Krempf M, et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:1489-99.
4. Nordestgaard BG, Chapman MJ, Ray K, et al. Lipoprotein(a) as a cardiovascular risk factor: current status. Eur Heart J 2010;31:2844-53.
5. Khera AV, Everett BM, Caulfield MP et al. Lipoprotein(a) concentrations, rosuvastatin therapy, and residual vascular risk: an analysis from the JUPITER Trial (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin). Circulation 2014;129:635-42.
6. Raal FJ, Giugliano RP, Sabatine MS et al. Reduction in lipoprotein(a) with PCSK9 monoclonal antibody evolocumab (AMG 145): a pooled analysis of more than 1,300 patients in 4 phase II trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:1278–88.
7. Gaudet D, Kereiakes DJ, McKenney JM et al. Effect of alirocumab, a monoclonal proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 antibody, on lipoprotein(a) concentrations (a pooled analysis of 150mg every two weeks dosing from phase 2 trials). Am J Cardiol 2014; 114:711–5.
8. Tsimikas S, Viney NJ, Hughes SG et al. Antisense therapy targeting apolipoprotein(a): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 study. Lancet 2015;386:1472-83.
9. Jørgensen AB, Frikke-Schmidt R, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjærg-Hansen A. Loss-of-function mutations in APOC3 and risk of ischemic vascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:32–41.
10. Blood I, Crosby J, Peloso GM, et al; Tg, Hdl Working Group of the Exome Sequencing Project NHL. Loss-of-function mutations in apoc3, triglycerides, and coronary disease. New Engl J Med 2014;371:22–31
11. Qamar A, Khetarpal SA, Khera AV et al. Plasma apolipoprotein C-III levels, triglycerides, and coronary artery calcification in type 2 diabetics. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2015;35:1880-8.
12. Gaudet D, Alexander VJ, Baker BF et al. Antisense Inhibition of Apolipoprotein C-III in Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia. N Engl J Med 2015;373:438-47.
13. Fruchart JC. Selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ? modulators (SPPARM?): the next generation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ?-agonists. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2013;12:82.
14. Kastelein JP, Senko Y, Hounslow N, Hovingh GK, Ginsberg HN. K-877, a selective PPAR alpha modulator (SPPARM alpha), ameliorates dyslipidaemia in patients with well-controlled LDL Cholesterol levels on statin therapy, without increases in serum creatinine. Eur Heart J 2015;36(Abstract Supplement):1048 [abstract].
15. Kastelein JJP, Senko Y, Hounslow N, Nojima T, Suganami H, Hovingh GK, Ginsberg HN. K-877, a selective PPAR alpha modulator (SPPARM alpha), improves dyslipidaemia in statin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eur Heart J 2015;36( Abstract Supplement):1048[abstract].
16. Lilly to Discontinue Development of Evacetrapib for High-Risk Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. https://investor.lilly.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=936130
17. Merck Provides Update on REVEAL Outcomes Study. http://www.mercknewsroom.com/news-release/research-and-development-news/merck-provides-update-reveal-outcomes-study
18. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Long term effects of lifestyle intervention or metformin on diabetes development and microvascular complications over 15-year follow-up: the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2015; Published Online September 14, 2015.
19. Avanzini F, Marzona I, Baviera M et al; Risk and Prevention Study Collaborative Group. Improving cardiovascular prevention in general practice: Results of a comprehensive personalized strategy in subjects at high risk. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2015 [Epub ahead of print].
?>