DEFINING TOMORROW'S VASCULAR STRATEGIES
×
Register now to R3i !
Your login
Your password
Confirm your password
Your email
I agree to receive the R3i newsletter
Mar 2024
The microvascular-macrovascular interplay: the next target?
Jan 2024
Targeting residual cardiovascular risk: what’s in the pipeline?
Sep 2023
Remnant cholesterol – evolving evidence
Jul 2023
Call to action on residual stroke risk
Apr 2023
Residual risk in 2023: where to?
Dec 2022
Lipid-related residual risk: lessons from PROMINENT?
Sep 2022
Residual cardiovascular risk: is apolipoprotein B the preferred marker?
Jul 2022
Residual vascular risk in chronic kidney disease: new options on the horizon
Feb 2022
Looking back at 2021 – what made the news?
Nov 2021
New ACC guidance addresses unmet clinical needs for high-risk patients with mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia
Sep 2021
Residual vascular risk: What matters?
Aug 2021
Understanding vein graft failure: a role for PPARalpha in pathobiology
May 2021
Residual cardiovascular risk: how to identify?
Apr 2021
Metabolic syndrome and COVID-19
Mar 2021
Elevated triglyceride: linking ASCVD and dementia
Feb 2021
Does SPPARMα offer new opportunities in metabolic syndrome and NAFLD?
Jan 2021
Omega-3 fatty acids for residual cardiovascular risk: more questions than answers
Oct 2020
Targeting triglycerides: Novel agents expand the field
Jul 2020
Why multidrug approaches are needed in NASH: insights with pemafibrate
Jun 2020
Triglyceride-rich remnant lipoproteins: a new therapeutic target in aortic valve stenosis?
Mar 2020
Lowering triglycerides or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: which provides greater clinical benefit?
Feb 2020
The omega-3 fatty acid conundrum
Dec 2019
Focus on stroke: more input to address residual cardiovascular risk
Jul 2019
International Expert Consensus on Selective Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha Modulator (SPPARMα): New opportunities for targeting modifiable residual cardiovascular risk
Nov 2018
Residual cardiovascular risk: triglyceride metabolism and genetics provide a key
Jul 2018
The clinical gap for managing residual cardiovascular risk: will new approaches make the difference?
Apr 2018
Residual cardiovascular risk: refocus on a multifactorial approach
Feb 2018
Optimizing treatment benefit: the tenet of personalized medicine
Jan 2018
Addressing residual cardiovascular risk – back to basics?
Dec 2017
Residual risk of heart failure: how to address this global epidemic?
Oct 2017
Remnants and residual cardiovascular risk: triglycerides or cholesterol?
Jul 2017
Targeting residual cardiovascular risk: lipids and beyond…
Jun 2017
Why we need to re-focus on Latin America.
Apr 2017
Residual cardiovascular risk in the Middle East: a perfect storm in the making
Feb 2017
A global call to action on residual cardiovascular risk
Dec 2016
SPPARM?: more than one way to tackle residual risk
Oct 2016
Remnants linked with diabetic myocardial dysfunction
Sep 2016
New study links elevated triglycerides with plaque progression
Aug 2016
Atherogenic dyslipidaemia: a risk factor for silent coronary artery disease
Jul 2016
SPPARM?: a concept becomes clinical reality
Jun 2016
Remnant cholesterol back in the news
May 2016
Back to the future: triglycerides revisited
Apr 2016
Unravelling the heritability of triglycerides and coronary risk
Mar 2016
Will residual cardiovascular risk meet its nemesis in 2016?
Feb 2016
Tackling residual cardiovascular risk: a case for targeting postprandial triglycerides?
Jan 2016
Looking back at 2015: lipid highlights
Dec 2015
Legacy effects in cardiovascular prevention
Nov 2015
Residual cardiovascular risk: it’s not just lipids!
Oct 2015
Addressing residual vascular risk: beyond pharmacotherapy
Sep 2015
Back to basics: triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, remnants and residual vascular risk
Jul 2015
Beyond the PCSK9 decade: what's next?
Jun 2015
Targeting triglycerides: what lies on the horizon for novel therapies?
Apr 2015
The Residual Risk Debate Hots Up: Lowering LDL-C or lowering remnant cholesterol?
Mar 2015
Call for action on stroke
Feb 2015
Triglycerides: the tide has turned
Jan 2015
Post IMPROVE-IT: Where to now for residual risk?
Dec 2014
R3i publishes new Call to Action paper: Residual Microvascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes in 2014: Is it Time for a Re-Think?
Sep 2014
Targeting residual vascular risk: round-up from ESC Congress 2014 and beyond
Jul 2014
Lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk: a new therapeutic target on the horizon
Mar 2014
Non-HDL-C and residual cardiovascular risk: the Lp(a) perspective
Feb 2014
REALIST Micro, atherogenic dyslipidaemia and residual microvascular risk
Jan 2014
Looking back at 2013: what have we learned about residual vascular risk?
Dec 2013
Long-overdue US guidelines for lipid management oversimplify the evidence
Nov 2013
Triglycerides and residual cardiovascular risk: where now?
Oct 2013
How to target residual cardiovascular risk?
Sep 2013
The Residual Vascular Risk Conundrum: Why we should target atherogenic dyslipidaemia
Jul 2013
Targeting atherogenic dyslipidemia: we need to do better
Apr 2013
Is PCSK9- targeted therapy the new hope for residual risk?
Mar 2013
Scope for multifocal approaches for reducing residual cardiovascular risk?
Feb 2013
Renewing the R3i call to action: Now more than ever we need to target and treat residual cardiovascular risk
Jan 2013
Time for a re-think on guidelines to reduce residual microvascular risk in diabetes?
Jan 2013
Addressing the residual burden of CVD in renal impairment: do PPARa agonists provide an answer?
Jan 2013
Re-evaluating options for residual risk post-HPS2-THRIVE : are SPPARMs the answer?
Dec 2012
Dysfunctional HDL: an additional target for reducing residual risk
Nov 2012
Egg consumption: a hidden residual risk factor
Oct 2012
Call to action: re-emphasising the importance of targeting residual vascular risk
Jun 2012
Time to prioritise atherogenic dyslipidaemia to reduce residual microvascular risk?
Jan 2012
Residual vascular risk in chronic kidney disease: an overlooked high-risk group
Dec 2011
Introducing the HDL Resource Center: HDL science now available for clinicians
Oct 2011
Targeting reverse cholesterol transport: the future of residual vascular risk reduction?
Sep 2011
After SPARCL: Targeting cardio-cerebrovascular metabolic risk and thrombosis to reduce residual risk of stroke
Jul 2011
Challenging the conventional wisdom: Lessons from the FIELD study on diabetic nephropathy
Jul 2010
ACCORD Eye Study: a milestone in residual microvascular risk reduction for patients with type 2 diabetes
May 2010
Lipids and residual risk of coronary heart disease in statin-treated patients
Mar 2010
ACCORD Lipid Study brings new hope to people with type 2 diabetes and atherogenic dyslipidemia
Mar 2010
Reducing residual risk of diabetic nephropathy: the role of lipoproteins
Dec 2009
ARBITER 6-HALTS: Implications for residual cardiovascular risk
Nov 2009
Microvascular event risk reduction in type 2 diabetes: New evidence from the FIELD study
Aug 2009
Fasting versus nonfasting triglycerides: Importance of triglyceride-regulating genetic polymorphisms to residual cardiovascular risk
Jul 2009
Residual risk of microvascular complications of diabetes: is intensive multitherapy the solution?
Apr 2009
Reducing residual vascular risk: modifiable and non modifiable residual vascular risk factors
Jan 2009
Micro- and macrovascular residual risk: one of the most challenging health problems of the moment
Nov 2008
Treated dyslipidemic patients remain at high residual risk of vascular events

R3i Editorial

18 May 2015
Do we need new lipid biomarkers for residual cardiovascular risk?
Prof. Jean Charles Fruchart, Prof. Jean Davignon, Prof. Michel Hermans, Prof. Pierre Amarenco
An Editorial from the R3i Trustees
 
Prof. Jean Charles Fruchart, Prof. Jean Davignon, Prof. Michel Hermans, Prof. Pierre Amarenco Cardiovascular disease burden continues to escalate, despite advances in diagnosis, management and pharmacotherapy over the last few decades. The latest news from the Global Burden of Disease 2013,1 shows that worldwide cardiovascular death rates are increasing, driven by both increasingly aging populations (accounting for more than half of this increase), together with population growth. Western and Central Europe stands alone in that, despite an aging population, decreases in age-specific cardiovascular mortality rates have culminated in a decline in the number of cardiovascular deaths. In part this decrease may relate to reduction in the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, such as smoking, as well as improved medical and surgical treatments. However, evidence from surveys such as EUROASPIRE IV2 shows that even with increased prescription of efficacious treatments, attainment of lipid targets continues to be suboptimal.

Improvement in guideline implementation is clearly indicated. As recommended by expert groups, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), which represents the sum of cholesterol in atherogenic apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins, is a simple, pragmatic lipid risk marker and treatment target. Indeed, in the 2013 Position Paper,3 the Residual Risk Reduction Initiative (R3i) called for non-HDL-C to be recognised as the key target for treatment decisions relating to lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk.

However, is there also a case to consider other lipid biomarkers that may be especially relevant to lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk. Triglycerides and HDL-C are components of atherogenic dyslipidaemia, a critical contributor to lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk. The ratio of triglycerides/HDL-C (TG/HDL-C), which takes account of these measures and grades atherogenic dyslipidemia as a continuous variable, is not only an acknowledged marker of insulin resistance/hyperinsulinemia but also an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk, as well as all-cause mortality.4-6 Recent reports add to the evidence for this biomarker. In this month’s Focus article,7 Wan and colleagues show that the TG/HDL-C ratio is a powerful independent predictor of all-cause mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients. A high TG/HDL-C ratio was also shown to be predictive of poor cardiovascular outcome in patients with chronic kidney disease.8 This latter finding is highly relevant, given that traditional lipid measures are often inadequate predictors of cardiovascular outcome in this group.9,10

Both practical considerations and clinical evidence inform the decision to consider a novel biomarker.11 The biomarker should offer new information of a strong, consistent association with the disease in question in numerous studies in a range of populations. The TG/HDL-C ratio is a simple, inexpensive, and reproducible marker of cardiovascular risk, demonstrated in patients with cardiometabolic disease, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,12-14 as well as in patients at high cardiovascular risk, including those with chronic kidney disease (as discussed above).

The key question is whether this marker adds new information beyond the use of non-HDL-C. Some have suggested that the TG/HDL-C ratio may be a better discriminator of cardiometabolic risk than non-HDL-C.15 Additionally, the use of the TG/HDL-C ratio may help to identify young individuals with early atherosclerotic changes, who may require monitoring to prevent cardiovascular disease in adulthood.16 In the context of an escalating obesity pandemic, these findings may offer support for the use of the TG/HDL-C ratio, although further study is merited.

Residual cardiovascular risk is clearly a global public health issue. While improved guideline implementation in practice is indicated, there may also be the need to consider other lipid biomarkers, especially those specific to atherogenic dyslipidaemia, a critical contributor to residual cardiovascular risk.

References

1. Roth GA, Forouzanfar MH, Moran AE et al. Demographic and epidemiologic drivers of global cardiovascular mortality. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1333-41.
2. Kotseva K, Wood D, De Bacquer D et al. EUROASPIRE IV: A European Society of Cardiology survey on the lifestyle, risk factor and therapeutic management of coronary patients from 24 European countries. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2015 [Epub ahead of print].
3. Fruchart JC, Davignon J, Hermans MP et al. Residual macrovascular risk in 2013: what have we learned? Cardiovasc Diabetol 2014;13:26.
4. McLaughlin T, Reaven G, Abbasi F et al. Is there a simple way to identify insulin-resistant individuals at increased risk of cardiovascular disease? Am J Cardiol 2005;96:399–404.
5. Bittner V, Johnson BD, Zineh I et al. The triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio predicts all-cause mortality in women with suspected myocardial ischemia: a report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). Am Heart J. 2009; 157: 548–555.
6. Eeg-Olofsson K, Gudbjörnsdottir S, Eliasson B et al. The triglycerides-to-HDL-cholesterol ratio and cardiovascular disease risk in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: an observational study from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR). Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014;106:136-44.
7. Wan K, Zhao J, Huang H, et al. The association between triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and all-cause mortality in acute coronary syndrome after coronary revascularization. PLoS ONE 10(4): e0123521.
8. Sonmez A, Yilmaz MI, Saglam M et al. The role of plasma triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio to predict cardiovascular outcomes in chronic kidney disease. Lipids in Health and Disease 2015;14:29.
9. Tonelli M, Muntner P, Lloyd A et al. Association between LDL-C and risk of myocardial infarction in CKD. Alberta Kidney Disease Network. J Am Soc Nephrol 2013;24:979–86.
10. Holzmann MJ, Jungner I, Walldius G et al. Dyslipidemia is a strong predictor of myocardial infarction in subjects with chronic kidney disease. Ann Med 2012;44:262–70.
11. Morrow DA, de Lemos JA. Benchmarks for the assessment of novel cardiovascular biomarkers. Circulation 2007;115,949–52.
12. Vega GL, Barlow CE, Grundy SM et al. Triglyceride-to-High-Density-Lipoprotein-Cholesterol Ratio is an index of heart disease mortality and of incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in men. J Investig Med 2014;62:345–9.
13. Onat A, Can G, Kaya H, Hergenç G. “Atherogenic index of plasma”(log10 triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol) predicts high blood pressure, diabetes, and vascular events. J Clin Lipidol 2010;4:89–98.
14. Hermans MP, Ahn SA, Rousseau MF. The atherogenic dyslipidemia ratio [log(TG)/HDL-C] is associated with residual vascular risk, beta-cell function loss and microangiopathy in type 2 diabetes females. Lipids Health Dis 2012;11:132.
15. Di Bonito P, Valerio G, Grugni G et al. Comparison of non-HDL-cholesterol versus triglycerides-to-HDL-cholesterol ratio in relation to cardiometabolic risk factors and preclinical organ damage in overweight/obese children: The CARITALY study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2015;25:489-94.
16. Di Bonito P, Moio N, Scilla C et al. Usefulness of the high triglyceride-to-HDL cholesterol ratio to identify cardiometabolic risk factors and preclinical signs of organ damage in outpatient children. Diabetes Care 2012;35:158-62.
?>