DEFINING TOMORROW'S VASCULAR STRATEGIES
×
Register now to R3i !
Your login
Your password
Confirm your password
Your email
I agree to receive the R3i newsletter
Mar 2024
The microvascular-macrovascular interplay: the next target?
Jan 2024
Targeting residual cardiovascular risk: what’s in the pipeline?
Sep 2023
Remnant cholesterol – evolving evidence
Jul 2023
Call to action on residual stroke risk
Apr 2023
Residual risk in 2023: where to?
Dec 2022
Lipid-related residual risk: lessons from PROMINENT?
Sep 2022
Residual cardiovascular risk: is apolipoprotein B the preferred marker?
Jul 2022
Residual vascular risk in chronic kidney disease: new options on the horizon
Feb 2022
Looking back at 2021 – what made the news?
Nov 2021
New ACC guidance addresses unmet clinical needs for high-risk patients with mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia
Sep 2021
Residual vascular risk: What matters?
Aug 2021
Understanding vein graft failure: a role for PPARalpha in pathobiology
May 2021
Residual cardiovascular risk: how to identify?
Apr 2021
Metabolic syndrome and COVID-19
Mar 2021
Elevated triglyceride: linking ASCVD and dementia
Feb 2021
Does SPPARMα offer new opportunities in metabolic syndrome and NAFLD?
Jan 2021
Omega-3 fatty acids for residual cardiovascular risk: more questions than answers
Oct 2020
Targeting triglycerides: Novel agents expand the field
Jul 2020
Why multidrug approaches are needed in NASH: insights with pemafibrate
Jun 2020
Triglyceride-rich remnant lipoproteins: a new therapeutic target in aortic valve stenosis?
Mar 2020
Lowering triglycerides or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: which provides greater clinical benefit?
Feb 2020
The omega-3 fatty acid conundrum
Dec 2019
Focus on stroke: more input to address residual cardiovascular risk
Jul 2019
International Expert Consensus on Selective Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha Modulator (SPPARMα): New opportunities for targeting modifiable residual cardiovascular risk
Nov 2018
Residual cardiovascular risk: triglyceride metabolism and genetics provide a key
Jul 2018
The clinical gap for managing residual cardiovascular risk: will new approaches make the difference?
Apr 2018
Residual cardiovascular risk: refocus on a multifactorial approach
Feb 2018
Optimizing treatment benefit: the tenet of personalized medicine
Jan 2018
Addressing residual cardiovascular risk – back to basics?
Dec 2017
Residual risk of heart failure: how to address this global epidemic?
Oct 2017
Remnants and residual cardiovascular risk: triglycerides or cholesterol?
Jul 2017
Targeting residual cardiovascular risk: lipids and beyond…
Jun 2017
Why we need to re-focus on Latin America.
Apr 2017
Residual cardiovascular risk in the Middle East: a perfect storm in the making
Feb 2017
A global call to action on residual cardiovascular risk
Dec 2016
SPPARM?: more than one way to tackle residual risk
Oct 2016
Remnants linked with diabetic myocardial dysfunction
Sep 2016
New study links elevated triglycerides with plaque progression
Aug 2016
Atherogenic dyslipidaemia: a risk factor for silent coronary artery disease
Jul 2016
SPPARM?: a concept becomes clinical reality
Jun 2016
Remnant cholesterol back in the news
May 2016
Back to the future: triglycerides revisited
Apr 2016
Unravelling the heritability of triglycerides and coronary risk
Mar 2016
Will residual cardiovascular risk meet its nemesis in 2016?
Feb 2016
Tackling residual cardiovascular risk: a case for targeting postprandial triglycerides?
Jan 2016
Looking back at 2015: lipid highlights
Dec 2015
Legacy effects in cardiovascular prevention
Nov 2015
Residual cardiovascular risk: it’s not just lipids!
Oct 2015
Addressing residual vascular risk: beyond pharmacotherapy
Sep 2015
Back to basics: triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, remnants and residual vascular risk
Jul 2015
Beyond the PCSK9 decade: what's next?
Jun 2015
Targeting triglycerides: what lies on the horizon for novel therapies?
May 2015
Do we need new lipid biomarkers for residual cardiovascular risk?
Apr 2015
The Residual Risk Debate Hots Up: Lowering LDL-C or lowering remnant cholesterol?
Mar 2015
Call for action on stroke
Feb 2015
Triglycerides: the tide has turned
Jan 2015
Post IMPROVE-IT: Where to now for residual risk?
Dec 2014
R3i publishes new Call to Action paper: Residual Microvascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes in 2014: Is it Time for a Re-Think?
Sep 2014
Targeting residual vascular risk: round-up from ESC Congress 2014 and beyond
Jul 2014
Lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk: a new therapeutic target on the horizon
Mar 2014
Non-HDL-C and residual cardiovascular risk: the Lp(a) perspective
Feb 2014
REALIST Micro, atherogenic dyslipidaemia and residual microvascular risk
Jan 2014
Looking back at 2013: what have we learned about residual vascular risk?
Dec 2013
Long-overdue US guidelines for lipid management oversimplify the evidence
Nov 2013
Triglycerides and residual cardiovascular risk: where now?
Oct 2013
How to target residual cardiovascular risk?
Sep 2013
The Residual Vascular Risk Conundrum: Why we should target atherogenic dyslipidaemia
Jul 2013
Targeting atherogenic dyslipidemia: we need to do better
Apr 2013
Is PCSK9- targeted therapy the new hope for residual risk?
Mar 2013
Scope for multifocal approaches for reducing residual cardiovascular risk?
Feb 2013
Renewing the R3i call to action: Now more than ever we need to target and treat residual cardiovascular risk
Jan 2013
Time for a re-think on guidelines to reduce residual microvascular risk in diabetes?
Jan 2013
Addressing the residual burden of CVD in renal impairment: do PPARa agonists provide an answer?
Jan 2013
Re-evaluating options for residual risk post-HPS2-THRIVE : are SPPARMs the answer?
Nov 2012
Egg consumption: a hidden residual risk factor
Oct 2012
Call to action: re-emphasising the importance of targeting residual vascular risk
Jun 2012
Time to prioritise atherogenic dyslipidaemia to reduce residual microvascular risk?
Jan 2012
Residual vascular risk in chronic kidney disease: an overlooked high-risk group
Dec 2011
Introducing the HDL Resource Center: HDL science now available for clinicians
Oct 2011
Targeting reverse cholesterol transport: the future of residual vascular risk reduction?
Sep 2011
After SPARCL: Targeting cardio-cerebrovascular metabolic risk and thrombosis to reduce residual risk of stroke
Jul 2011
Challenging the conventional wisdom: Lessons from the FIELD study on diabetic nephropathy
Jul 2010
ACCORD Eye Study: a milestone in residual microvascular risk reduction for patients with type 2 diabetes
May 2010
Lipids and residual risk of coronary heart disease in statin-treated patients
Mar 2010
ACCORD Lipid Study brings new hope to people with type 2 diabetes and atherogenic dyslipidemia
Mar 2010
Reducing residual risk of diabetic nephropathy: the role of lipoproteins
Dec 2009
ARBITER 6-HALTS: Implications for residual cardiovascular risk
Nov 2009
Microvascular event risk reduction in type 2 diabetes: New evidence from the FIELD study
Aug 2009
Fasting versus nonfasting triglycerides: Importance of triglyceride-regulating genetic polymorphisms to residual cardiovascular risk
Jul 2009
Residual risk of microvascular complications of diabetes: is intensive multitherapy the solution?
Apr 2009
Reducing residual vascular risk: modifiable and non modifiable residual vascular risk factors
Jan 2009
Micro- and macrovascular residual risk: one of the most challenging health problems of the moment
Nov 2008
Treated dyslipidemic patients remain at high residual risk of vascular events

R3i Editorial

8 December 2012
Dysfunctional HDL: an additional target for reducing residual risk
Prof. JC Fruchart, Prof. J. Davignon, Prof. M Hermans
Board of the R3i Trustees
 
Prof. JC Fruchart, Prof. J. Davignon, Prof. M Hermans Undoubtedly, a low plasma level of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, a surrogate measure of HDL subpopulations, is an independent cardiovascular risk factor, as recognised by the recent ESC/EAS guidelines for dyslipidemia management.(1 )
Population studies have conclusively shown that HDL cholesterol is an inverse predictor of cardiovascular risk, at all levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.(2)
However, the concept that raising HDL cholesterol levels will translate to clinical benefit is too simplistic. This was highlighted in a recent post on the R3i website focusing on the demise of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor dalcetrapib. Consequently, improving the functionality of HDL is increasingly viewed as an important target in residual vascular risk.

Potentially atheroprotective biological activities of HDL, including a role in cellular cholesterol efflux, and anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory effects, have been described in animal models.(3) However, the presence of prolonged inflammation and oxidative stress associated with atherosclerosis can modify HDL functionality, shifting the balance in favour of atherogenesis. For example, HDL from patients with stable coronary heart disease or acute coronary syndrome exhibit attenuated endothelial repair capacity, as well as reduced anti-inflammatory activity, compared with HDL from healthy individuals.(4) These decreases in HDL functionality may predispose to the development and progression of cardiovascular disease.

HDL anti-atherogenic function is also defective in diabetes. Prolonged hyperglycaemia is thought to promote the formation of HDL that are ‘pro-inflammatory’, and less able to inhibit monocyte migration induced by LDL.(5) Studies have shown that glycation of paraoxonase-1 (PON-1), an anti-oxidant enzyme associated with HDL, inhibits its ability to decrease endothelial cell production of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and thus prevent monocyte adhesion, one of the earliest stages of atherosclerosis. PON-1 levels are also substantially lower in individuals with diabetes and CHD.(6)

The mechanisms underlying these changes in HDL functionality are not yet clear, although some have suggested that HDL remodelling and/or changes in the protein and/or lipid composition of HDL may play a role. Additionally, which of the atheroprotective function(s) of HDL are more relevant to cardiovascular risk is not certain, although a recent study has implicated cellular cholesterol efflux capacity as an independent predictor of coronary heart disease risk.(7)

What is the relevance of HDL functionality to residual cardiovascular risk?

Statin therapy has been shown to improve HDL anti-atherogenic functionality in individuals with cardiovascular disease. Despite this, HDL function is still defective compared with controls.(8)

Thus, from the perspective of the R3i, strategies that are able to both normalise defective HDL function, as well as lower elevated levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, might represent a complementary approach to reducing residual vascular risk.

Of the available pharmacological treatments, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) α agonists (fibrates) offer specific advantages beyond enhancing HDL-mediated reverse cholesterol transport, given their pleiotropic effects, including anti-inflammatory activity, particularly in individuals with type 2 diabetes or metabolic syndrome. Niacin has also been shown to protect against experimentally induced endothelial dysfunction and inhibit vascular inflammation, independent of changes in plasma lipid levels.(9) However, the role of niacin in reducing residual cardiovascular risk has recently been questioned, given the lack of benefit reported with combination statin-niacin treatment in AIM-HIGH.(10)

For the future, there are a number of possibilities that might offer potential to improve defective HDL functionality, with or without lowering triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. In the acute coronary syndrome setting, apolipoprotein (apo) A-I mimetics and reconstituted HDL may offer promise for improving HDL number and /or functionality, although these do not target apoB-containing lipoproteins. CHI-SQUARE (Can HDL Infusions Significantly Quicken Atherosclerosis Regression?), the first trial with one of these agents, CER-001, a first in class pre-beta HDL mimetic, is expected to report at AHA later this year.

No doubt the debate regarding the relevance of targeting HDL quality, together with lowering triglycerides, to reduce residual vascular risk will continue until we have data from ongoing clinical trials.


References

1. Reiner Z, Catapano AL, De Backer G, et al. ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Eur Heart J 2011;32:1769-818.
2. The Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration. Major lipids, apolipoproteins, and risk of vascular disease. JAMA 2009;302:1993-2000.
3. Rye KA, Bursill CA, Lambert G, Tabet F, Barter PJ. The metabolism and anti-atherogenic properties of HDL. J Lipid Res 2009;50 (Suppl):S195-S200.
4. Besler C, Heinrich K, Rohrer L, et al. Mechanisms underlying adverse effects of HDL on eNOS-activating pathways in patients with coronary artery disease. J Clin Invest 2011;121:2693-708.
5. Kontush A, Chapman MJ. Functionally defective high-density lipoprotein: a new therapeutic target at the crossroads of dyslipidaemia, inflammation, and atherosclerosis. Pharmacol Rev 2006;58:342-74.
6. Elboudwarej O, Hojjat H, Safarpoor S et al. Dysfunctional HDL and cardiovascular disease risk in individuals with diabetic dyslipidemia. J Diabetes Metab 2011;doi:10.4172/2155-6156.
7. Khera AV, Cuchel M, de la Llera-Moya M et al. Cholesterol efflux capacity, high-density lipoprotein function, and atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2011;364:127-35.
8. Ansell BJ, Navab M, Hama S et al. Inflammatory/antiiflammatory properties of high-density lipoprotein distinguish patients from control subjects better than high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and are favourably affected by simvastatin treatment. Circulation 2003;108:2751-6.
9. Chapman MJ, Redfern JS, McGovern ME, Giral P. Niacin and fibrates in atherogenic dyslipidemia: Pharmacotherapy to reduce cardiovascular risk. Pharmacol Ther 2010;126:314–45.
10. AIM-HIGH Investigators, Boden WE, Probstfield JL, Anderson T et al. Niacin in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy. N Engl J Med 2011;365:2255-67.
?>